The U.S. Senate is emerging as a potential bulwark against proposed rule changes that would give government bureaucrats more control over scientific funding.
A draft agreement to fund the government through December 11 that was released on [August 2, 2026] would extend the current system for the disbursement of science-related grants …. If this continuing resolution were to pass, it would effectively stall the Office of Budget Management’s (OMB’s) proposed rule changes from coming into effect until at least that date. …
“The Senate bill forces OMB to continue reviewing the half-million comments that were submitted, but Congress must permanently prevent this corrupt, harmful power grab before the new deadline of December 11,” [said Representative Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut, ranking member of the House Committee on Appropriations].
The OMB’s proposed changes would give political appointees, rather than the current system of panels of independent peer reviewers, the power to review and decide which research grants get funding from federal agencies.
Related on the SLP
Scientists rushed to condemn the proposal during the public comment period, which closed on July 13. Critics included several Nobel laureates, who warned it would politicize the scientific process and greatly damage U.S. scientific advancement.
