Beliefs about creationism not good test of public’s science literacy

Homo Models
Modes of ancient homo sapiens. (Credit: Wikimedia)

Half of all Americans say they don’t believe in evolution when asked in polls. This fact is often used as fodder to illustrate how ‘broken’ the U.S. science education system is. The number goes well beyond half when you ask about believe in ‘Darwinian’ evolution, according to Dan Kahan at the Yale Law School Cultural Cognition project.

But there are some big problems with using belief in creationism as a measure. First, and most importantly, measuring a believe has nothing to do with science literacy.

People can easily believe in things that they don’t understand, and understand things they don’t believe. Asking people whether or not they are creationists doesn’t test their knowledge of the fundamental principals of evolution: natural selection, random mutation, and genetic variance. And many of the people who respond that they do believe in evolution might not actually understand those principals they profess to know.

Want to get better, data? Ask a better question. Kahan explains his research data from based on an experiment from National Science Foundation:

Instead of asking for a true/false response to “human beings, as we know them today, developed earlier species of animals,” Kahan simply added the clause “According to the theory of evolution..” to the question:

As the Figure at the top of the post shows, the proportion who selected “true” jumped from 55% on the NSF item to 81% on the GSS one!
Wow!  Who would have thought it would be so easy to improve the “science literacy” of benighted Americans (who leaving aside the “evolution” and related “big bang” origin-of-the-universe items already tend to score better on the NSF battery than members of other industrialized nations).
Seriously: as a measure of what test takers know about science, there’s absolutely no less content in the GSS version than the NSF.  Indeed, if anyone who was asked to give an explanation for why “true” is the correct response to the NSF version failed to connect the answer to  “evidence consistent with the theory of evolution  …” would be revealed to have no idea what he or she is talking about.

But, Kahan also argues that both these questions just touch on rote memorization of facts, and don’t really touch understanding of the scientific method, which is the most important factor in quantifying the public’s scientific literacy. Even if people chose not to believe in evolution, at least most of them know some basic principles about it.

Additional Resources:

 

Outbreak
Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

As Europe sees record coronavirus cases and deaths, Slovakia is testing its entire adult population. WSJ's Drew Hinshaw explains how ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
globalmethanebudget globalcarbonproject cropped x

Infographic: Cows cause climate change? Agriculture scientist says ‘belching bovines’ get too much blame

A recent interview by Caroline Stocks, a UK journalist who writes about food, agriculture and the environment, of air quality ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...
favicon

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend