GM and organic crops need not be separate in food debate to achieve best outcome in feeding world’s hungry

Given its centrality to our existence and lifestyle, it is unsurprising that the different ways in which food can be grown, the comparative benefits of using only naturally-occurring fertiliser and pesticides (organic farming), the impact of synthetic pesticides, and the development of genetically modified (GM) crops cause ongoing community debate about what we eat and how it’s grown, now and in the future.

Dr David Tribe is a microbiologist and food scientist from the University’s Melbourne School of Land and Environment. He says debate over whether organically or conventionally grown food is better, and the idea that GM and organics are opposed – that one must prevail to feed us in the future – is muddying the conversation about the way forward and in some cases, is actually preventing food safety messages from reaching the public.

“It’s about how we can make food production better, how can we make food and food choices better. Both ways of approaching it have a role in that.

“GMOs [genetically modified organisms] sometimes help do that, and the ideas behind organic farming sometimes help do that. We need to concentrate on how to make farming work better in terms of the environment and the livelihoods of farmers, and how to offer people better food choices.

“Scientists are solely concerned with discovering how to achieve the best outcome. We can take the best of these two different worlds. They needn’t be separate.”

This ongoing debate continues as we draw closer to a time when we will have bigger issues than how our food is grown: without action, food security will increasingly become an issue across the world due to population growth and climate change.

Dr Tribe says it is not that Australians will face famine, but rather some food will be very expensive and overseas, poor people will suffer, especially in the cities. “People in developing countries will face price shocks, such as when prices rose suddenly in 2008, causing riots around the world,” he says. “Australians only spend a fraction of their income on food. Poor people in the developing world spend a much larger portion of their income on it.”

Read the full, original article: The great food debate

Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped

Video: We can ‘finally’ grow GMOs—Nigerian farmer explains why developing countries need biotech crops

Nigerian farmer Patience Koku discusses the GMO crop trials she is conducting on her farm, and why growers can "rise ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
globalmethanebudget globalcarbonproject cropped x

Infographic: Cows cause climate change? Agriculture scientist says ‘belching bovines’ get too much blame

A recent interview by Caroline Stocks, a UK journalist who writes about food, agriculture and the environment, of air quality ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...
gmo corn field x

Do GMO Bt (insect-resistant) crops pose a threat to human health or the environment?

Bt is a bacterium found organically in the soil. It is extremely effective in repelling or killing target insects but ...

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend