Anti-GMO advocates try to scare diabetics off life-saving genetically engineered drug treatment

Anti-GMO propaganda targets human insulin.

In the late 1970s scientists used genetic engineering to piece the gene for human insulin production into E. Coli or yeast cells, essentially turning them into tiny insulin factories. Before this technology, diabetics had to inject themselves with insulin from ground up pork and beef pancreases. The human stuff offers a lot of benefit over the animal variety: it’s more useful for controlling blood sugar levels and it causes many fewer allergic reactions than the animal-derived insulin.

But, because synthetic human insulin is derived from genetically modified yeast or bacteria cells, no amount of evidence, including 40 years of intensive study and millions of diabetics who would have died without the treatment, will convince some anti-GMO activists of its safety. Why? Because it’s ‘not natural.’

A number of anti-technology activists launched a coordinated campaign over the past week by misrepresenting a recent small Japanese study that identified six patients with Type 2 diabetes who began developing Type 1 diabetes after starting insulin. The actual study makes no mention of GMO insulin or the animal-produced variety, which is perfectly safe, as Kevin Folta, head Horticultural Sciences at the University of Florida and an expert on genetic engineering, points out on his blog.

We all depend on insulin, a hormone synthesized in the Pancreas, to control blood sugar levels. Elevated blood sugar can lead to a variety of metabolic disorders and long-term damage to various organs. Type II diabetics produce too much at first, leading to insulin resistance, a state where the body just does not respond to the hormone and blood sugar levels remain high. Eventually type II’s do not produce enough, so they need to control blood sugar with drugs, or in some cases administer insulin injections to manage their levels. Insulin for human use used to be purified from the pancreas of slaughtered animals. The preparations obviously would contain other potentially reactive proteins, which presented an attractive solution for recominant DNA technology.  Recombinant insulin was first generated way back in the 1970’s, and today is generated in yeast or E.coli in massive fermeneters. The recombinant (GMO) insulin is infinitely more pure, safe and available.

But for ideologues, facts be damned. GMO Free USA posted the ridiculous infographic featured on this page, taking it down just this morning after they were swamped with ridicule. Another soldier in the anti-GMO demonization campaign, Sayer Ji, a blogger at GreenMedInfo, tried to argue that recombinant human insulin causes an autoimmune reaction for two reasons: one, because it comes packaged with other ingredients to keep it in soluble, injectable form; and two, because it is not identical to human insulin because the protein folds up differently. Ji argues this 3D folding difference makes synthetic human insulin an immune system target and subsequently causes the reaction that develops into type 1 diabetes.

Ji’s argument make no sense if you know anything about the pathology of type 1 diabetes. The autoimmune response is caused because the body makes antibodies against proteins on the surface of the pancreas cells that make the insulin and kills them. The insulin molecule itself has nothing to do with with the immune reaction responsible for the disease. Saying the reaction found in the study is a result of ‘GMO insulin’ and implying it would not be the case of pork-produced insulin is just fallacious.

GMO insulin has long been on activists’ hit list. The Internet is filled with misleading stories. For example, something called EcoGlobe wrote this on its website four years ago:

It is vital that the word is spread about the true effects of this stuff (including sudden and unexpected deaths) on many diabetics. It is vital too that pro-GM scientists in America are NOT allowed to get away with making out that GM insulin has been this great GM success story. It is far from being so. I don’t recall a single instance where a diabetic has felt better on the GM insulin than the animal; I’d be glad to hear from any.

Mike Adams over at Natural News has been on attack for years, cherry-picking elements from articles and studies to hype the alleged dangers of insulin injections. His crackpot stories are invariably followed by a commercial plug

You can also learn more about how to cure diabetes naturally, without drugs, by visiting: More:

How is genetically engineered insulin made? Biofortified has an excellent post that illuminates why activists hate it: because the GM technology being used to save millions of lives every year is identical and just as safe as the GM technology used in food:

Insulin is made, in principle, the same way GMO corn starch and GMO sugar in cereals are. To start, the DNA sequence for human insulin is inserted into the bacteria E. coli, which creates an organism that now has DNA from two very different species in it. This new E. coli is a genetically modified organism (GMO) and serves as a cheap factory for mass-producing the human insulin protein. After a while, the E. coli bacteria has produced large amounts of the human protein to the point where the protein can be extracted from the bacteria cells and purified before being packaged into insulin shots. The insulin protein produced via genetic engineering is chemically identical to the insulin protein made in a healthy human body.

Another issue, which Ji and his ilk leave out, is that the patients in the study all had genetic markers that conveyed a high risk for development of Type 1 diabetes. In the past, type 1 diabetes was called juvenile diabetes because it was mainly diagnosed in kids and teenagers. But, in recent decades more and more adults are coming down with autoimmune diabetes. Basically the patients included in this study were already at high risk of Type 1.

Why mislead the public about recombinant insulin using this study? To convince people to buy an unregulated and untested product? To get more clicks on a ’10 foods that stop diabetes list’? To further the anti-GMO demonization effort? That’s all easy to do when no one could possibly hold your irresponsibility at fault for harm caused by misinformation writes Folta:

Once again, anti-GMO activists like those at GreenMedInfo and GMOFreeUSA rub their crystals and align their shakras in a message that stands to strike fear in those using safe and dependable insulin therapies. This kind of fear mongering is just an extension of their normal routine– condemning good technology and products to fit their own agendas, even if it causes harm or death to others in the process.

Additional Resources:

  • Eric Bjerregaard

    How could someone be hard hearted and conscience free to attempt to drive someone away from such a long proven, and safe product? And some folks wonder why I view the anti g. e. leadership with the same disdain as I view the Taliban, irs, and putin.

  • James.m

    While I appreciate your work, clearly the study raises an alarming possibility: Does it not?

    • Not if you read it. It actually puts a damper on any alarms–just the opposite of the way its being hyped by ideologues.

  • First Officer

    Has the ADA been alerted? They may have to counsel diabetics not to forego their insulin.

  • Red_Ruffensor

    I threw away my insulin and followed Natural News’ five-step program to cure my diabetes, and now I’m dead. Thanks a lot, Natural News.

  • stacy

    I found this site and will try for sure. My friend says it worked for her.

  • Bradley James

    I have two pro Gmo baby boomer inlaws who have diabetes and spend most of their time talking about their monsanto nascar team. Sheeple wake up .

    • montana83

      GMO’s use fewer pesticides, fewer herbicides, less water, produce more food per acre than organic crops. There is not one scientific study proving that GMO foods has harmed even (1) person so give it up, dude.
      You want to eat organic Brussels sprouts covered in pig $hit go right ahead, but please leave your anti-science B.S. behind.

  • Honda450R

    I have had type 1 diabetes for 42 years. I started on the natural insulin and later took the DNA insulin. I can’t stand the DNA insulin. For the past 10 years I have been importing natural insulin from Europe (Wockhardt). I will never go back on the DNA insulin unless I have to. The natural insulin (I take pork) doesn’t hit nearly as hard as the DNA insulin and my sugars aren’t all over the place. My sugars tend to run a little higher but I feel so much better. I was on 5 to 6 shots a day on the DNA insulin and went back to 2 sometimes 3 shots a day on the natural insulin. It is recommended to eat natural foods but not recommended to take natural medications such as insulin. Natural insulin isn’t perfect but works much better for me. Canada sells natural insulin but I can’t import it from them anymore. I would almost consider moving to Canada if I can’t import from Europe anymore.