Center for Food Safety intervenes to defend Vermont GMO labeling law

Two advocacy groups are looking to help defend the state against an industry group lawsuit against Vermontโ€™s GMO labeling law.ย The Vermont Public Interest Research Group and the Center for Food Safety say they have filed papers to formally move for party status in the lawsuit against Act 120, which was signed into law in May by Gov. Peter Shumlin. The two groups want to intervene on behalf of the state to assist in defending the law. Both groups are being represented jointly by lawyers from CFS and the Vermont Law Schoolโ€™s Environmental and Natural Resources Law Clinic.

โ€œCorporations donโ€™t get a veto in the state of Vermont,โ€ said George Kimbrell, a senior attorney for CFS who will serve as the lead attorney for VPIRG and CFS. โ€œWe will vigorously defend this legally sound and important law, which is critical to our members and our mission.โ€

Paul Burns, executive director of VPIRG, said his group is prepared to contribute resources to help the state defend the law.ย โ€œVermonters take their food seriously, and this law gives them the information they need to make informed purchasing choices,โ€ Burns said. โ€œVPIRG will do whatever we can to defend the GMO labeling law from corporate bullies who would rather keep consumers in the dark about whatโ€™s in their food.โ€

Read the full, original article:ย GMO labeling law lands allies

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpointโ€”โ€œMiracle moleculeโ€ debunked: Why acemannan supplements donโ€™t work
Screenshot 2025-07-30 at 10.48
Can gene editing eliminate Down syndrome? Scientists have done it in lab-grown cells
Screenshot 2026-05-26 at 10.15
Viewpoint: Double standardโ€”Why does the wellness industry get a free pass while Big Healthcare is treated as morally suspect?
tick-DNA
GLP podcast: Spread meat allergy with gene-edited ticks? Bioethicists pose vile โ€˜thought experimentโ€™
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-4-2026-01_27_58-PM
Viewpointโ€”N.A.D.+: Why Gwenyth Paltrowโ€™s heralded anti-aging supplement doesnโ€™t work
ChatGPT-Image-May-26-2026-07_51_21-AM-2
Viewpoint: There are more than 1,000 chemicals in a cup of coffeeโ€”including many substances that can cause cancer. Why isnโ€™t it banned?
downsyndrome_compilation_MID_1
CRISPR breakthrough that can remove the chromosome responsible for Down syndrome raises ethical questions

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.