Controversial fetal cell transplants revived for Parkinson’s trials

| October 7, 2014
px Substantia Nigra
Substantia Nigra's dopamine producing cells degrade in Parkinson's disease (Credit: Geoff B Hall - Own work. Licensed under Creative Commons via Wikimedia Commons)
This article or excerpt is included in the GLP’s daily curated selection of ideologically diverse news, opinion and analysis of biotechnology innovation.

For the last 25 years, using fetal tissue for scientific research has largely fallen out of favor in both the European and U.S. scientific communities. One of the most publicized uses of the controversial technique was a series of trials that transferred dopamine-producing neural tissue from aborted fetuses into the affected brain regions of Parkinson’s disease patients.

The results were a mixed bag, and the procedure was largely abandoned. But, a new look at the 70 plus patients who participated in the trials, better transplant techniques and a hope that the procedures would work better with stem cells, when they become available, has spurred a European initiative to begin transplants again.

The TRANSEURO program is currently recruiting 150 patients to research centers throughout Europe. But, the program will do something different than the trials in the 1990s. It will be much more selective about which patients can receive the transplants.

In Parkinson’s disease, patients lose the cells that produce the neurotransmitter dopamine in their brain. This affects their ability to move and eventually their cognitive abilities. Fetal cell transplants take these dopamine-producing cells from aborted neural tissue and, through a small hole in the skull, introduce them into the affected brain regions of Parkinson’s patients. Transplanted cells integrate themselves into the recipient’s neural networks and take over dopamine-producing function from their rapidly degrading counterparts.

The 1990s trials showed that younger patients with less severe symptoms who received the most dopamine-producing cells did best with the transplants. To that end, the new trials are focusing on patients an average of 55 years old who have not developed side effects of traditional Parkinson’s medication. The trials will also use more fetal cells, according to Nature:

In addition, post-mortem analysis of patients’ brains showed that those who benefited most had at least 100,000 dopamine-producing cells of fetal origin integrated into their brains. Cells from at least three fetuses are needed to achieve these numbers, the neuroscientists concluded.

The hope, according to Shirley Wang at the Wall Street Journal, is that perfecting this technique will allow a smooth transition from fetal tissue to stem cells when they become a viable alternative:

Scientists hope that as cell-therapy science continues to advance, the treatment will shift to using stem cells rather than fetal tissue. Stem cells provide a renewable source of cells and are more versatile, able to differentiate into any type of cell. Some types can exist in adults, but they need to be coaxed or programmed into nerve cells that produce dopamine.

But scientists caution that there’s no way to know when those stem cells will be ready because of their fragility and the difficulty in programming them to become the target dopamine-producing neurons. In the meantime, it’s important to continue with the fetal transplants that might allow patients longevity and improved quality of life. Because the fetal cells are already on the established path to becoming dopamine-producing cells, the body knows how to complete the process, stem-cell biologist and clinical trial member Malin Parmar told Nature. This is not the case will stem cells. However, Harvard stem cell researcher Ole Isacson noted that healthy fetal cells are not easy to get, either.

Another note of caution is the relative small number of patients who benefited from the treatments, a seeming handful in each of the clinical trials. These patients did remain medication and symptom free for more than a decade, but symptoms did eventually return. However, they all died from causes not related to the disease.

Discussion of the trial revival skirts the most controversial aspect of the transplants, use of aborted fetal tissue. Some opponents argue that this incentivizes women to chose abortion. That seems to be less of an issue in many of the European countries housing the new trial where access to abortion services is less controversial. But if these transplants are successful, many patients may need to soul search as they balance their future quality of life against moral reservations.

Meredith Knight is editor of the human genetics section for Genetic Literacy Project and a freelance science and health writer in Austin, Texas. Follow her @meremereknight.

Additional Resources:

The GLP featured this article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis. The viewpoint is the author’s own. The GLP’s goal is to stimulate constructive discourse on challenging science issues.

Outbreak
Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
a a b b a f ac a

Video: Death by COVID: The projected grim toll in historical context

The latest statistics, as of July 10, show COVID-19-related deaths in U.S. are just under 1,000 per day nationally, which is ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
types of oak trees

Infographic: Power of evolution? How oak trees came to dominate North American forests

Over the course of some 56 million years, oaks, which all belong to the genus Quercus, evolved from a single undifferentiated ...
biotechnology worker x

Can GMOs rescue threatened plants and crops?

Some scientists and ecologists argue that humans are in the midst of an "extinction crisis" — the sixth wave of ...
food globe x

Are GMOs necessary to feed the world?

Experts estimate that agricultural production needs to roughly double in the coming decades. How can that be achieved? ...
eating gmo corn on the cob x

Are GMOs safe?

In 2015, 15 scientists and activists issued a statement, "No Scientific consensus on GMO safety," in the journal Environmental Sciences ...
Screen Shot at PM

Charles Benbrook: Agricultural economist and consultant for the organic industry and anti-biotechnology advocacy groups

Independent scientists rip Benbrook's co-authored commentary in New England Journal calling for reassessment of dangers of all GMO crops and herbicides ...
Screen Shot at PM

ETC Group: ‘Extreme’ biotechnology critic campaigns against synthetic biology and other forms of ‘extreme genetic engineering’

The ETC Group is an international environmental non-governmental organization (NGO) based in Canada whose stated purpose is to monitor "the impact of emerging technologies and ...
Share via
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend