Resource-poor farmers in developing countries lead global biotech production

Screen Shot at PM

More than 90 percent of the 18 million growers that produced biotech crops were resource-poor farmers in developing countries. Since the commercial introduction of GM crops in 1994, their global acreage has increased 100-fold, to over 175 million hectares, or about one-eighth of Earth’s farmable land.

Genetically Modified foods are not grown in India, but more than 90 percent of the country’s cotton acreage is genetically engineered to produce Bt insecticidal proteins. Farming of Bt cotton officially began in 2002–2003. Over the next five years, yields increased by 70 percent and have since stabilized at near-historic levels, with cotton production up 75 percent since Bt cotton’s official introduction. Other factors, including irrigation and fertilizer use, have also changed, so Bt cotton is not India’s only source of yield improvements. Still, data indicate that Bt cotton alone accounts for a yield increase of at least 19 percent. Once reliant on cotton imports to feed its textile industry, India now exports cotton.

Screen Shot 2014-10-18 at 1.13.02 PM
Courtesy Jessica Radovich and Ania Wieczorek, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawai‘i at Manoa

More than 90 percent of the 18 million growers that produced biotech crops were resource-poor farmers in developing countries. Since the commercial introduction of GM crops in 1994, their global acreage has increased 100-fold, to over 175 million hectares, or about one-eighth of Earth’s farmable land.

Genetically Modified foods are not grown in India, but more than 90 percent of the country’s cotton acreage is genetically engineered to produce Bt insecticidal proteins. Farming of Bt cotton officially began in 2002–2003. Over the next five years, yields increased by 70 percent and have since stabilized at near-historic levels, with cotton production up 75 percent since Bt cotton’s official introduction. Other factors, including irrigation and fertilizer use, have also changed, so Bt cotton is not India’s only source of yield improvements. Still, data indicate that Bt cotton alone accounts for a yield increase of at least 19 percent. Once reliant on cotton imports to feed its textile industry, India now exports cotton.

While Bt cotton’s production costs are higher than conventional cotton because GM seeds cost more, these costs are offset by increased yields and reduced use of pesticides. Bt cotton growers have seen a 50 percent average increase in profits, or an estimated $80 to $350 more per hectare. Because Bt hybrid seed offers reliably improved harvests, most farmers are willing to pay for it each year, even though Indian law gives farmers the right to sow, share, or sell seeds that they’ve saved.

Outbreak
Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

As Europe sees record coronavirus cases and deaths, Slovakia is testing its entire adult population. WSJ's Drew Hinshaw explains how ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
globalmethanebudget globalcarbonproject cropped x

Infographic: Cows cause climate change? Agriculture scientist says ‘belching bovines’ get too much blame

A recent interview by Caroline Stocks, a UK journalist who writes about food, agriculture and the environment, of air quality ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...
favicon

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend