Some countries’ GMO laws aren’t about safety: They’re politically motivated

A common argument that you may read about the dangers of GMOs is how different countries around the world have banned them or have legislation around them. Here’s an example from the Non-GMO Project’s website:

“Most developed nations do not consider GMOs to be safe. In more than 60 countries around the world, including Australia, Japan, and all of the countries in the European Union, there are significant restrictions or outright bans on the production and sale of GMOs.”

You can see how this can lead to a conspiracy theory with the following narrative: GMOs aren’t properly tested in the United States. In Europe, scientists have discovered that GMOs can be harmful and they’ve been banned. But in the US, the FDA is in bed with Monsanto, which is why we’re eating these toxic poisons and we aren’t being told the truth.

In terms of “bans”, there’s actually only one country in the world that has an outright ban: Kenya. Recently, there have been calls to lift the ban due to farming losses. 

All other countries have laws and regulations surrounding biotech crops. 

The four countries I examined—Canada, Israel, Venezuela and Iran (all countries to which I have a personal connection)—are extremely diverse in terms of economic status and development, as well as their relationship with the U.S. Despite these differences, I think that the common thread is that laws for and against GMOs are economic or political in nature, and have little to do with safety. If it were genuinely about safety, then they’d ban the import of GMOs and join the ranks of Kenya.

Read full, original article: The Life and Times of BioChica as Told Through GMO Legislation Around the World

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-04-23-at-11.00.36-AM
Regulators' dilemma: Thalidomide, Metformin, and the cost of getting drug approvals wrong
Picture1-5
Science Disinformation Gap: The transatlantic battle over social media and censorship
ChatGPT-Image-May-13-2026-11_56_08-AM
After slashing global health aid by $19 Billion, Trump moves to tap $2.1 billion more—to cover shutdown costs
ChatGPT-Image-May-12-2026-08_39_41-PM
GLP podcast: Big Pharma, Big Ag, Big Food—health harming industries or life-saving innovators?
ChatGPT Image May 10, 2026, 08_16_59 PM 2
Overmedicalization? RFK Jr.’s antidepressant crackdown raises conflict questions over his fee stake in Wisner Baum, the tort firm built on suing drug makers
Screenshot-2026-05-12-at-9.58.31-PM
'He seems fine': Marty Makary out as FDA commissioner
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-13-2026-02_20_22-PM
Viewpoint: Misinformation infodemic? Why assessing evidence is so challenging 
Screenshot-2026-05-01-at-1.29.41-PM
Viewpoint: What happens when whole grains meet modern food manufacturing? Labels don’t tell the whole story.
Picture1-1
Cooling the planet with balloons: Could a geoengineering gamble slow global warming?
Screenshot-2026-05-11-104424
Hantavirus outbreak research: Trump administration shut down study last year on rodent-to-human transmission
S
As vaccine rejectionism spreads, measles may be taking a more dangerous turn
images
The never-ending GMO debate: Pros and cons
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.