Neither environmentalists nor industry happy with EU rules on GMOs

Campaign groups and the biotech industry are digging in for a new round of conflict, following the European Union’s decision to allow member states to set their own rules on growing genetically modified organisms.

Environmentalists who favor a GMO ban say the crops have not been properly tested – posing health risks for consumers and giving a small group of corporations too much control over food supplies. The biotech industry says farmers should be free to grow whatever crops they want, and GMOs are a safe way to boost food production and feed the planet’s growing population.

Brandon Mitchener, a spokesman for Monsanto, the world’s largest seed company and a big producer of genetically altered crops, said the EU decision was misguided.

It would allow “some member states to torpedo a proven, safe technology for helping farmers produce more with less even as U.S. farmers are setting new records with the same technology”, he said in an email.

But the proposed legislation does not satisfy environmental campaigners either.

“The main problem we have with this law is it prevents member states from using environmental concerns to justify their bans,” Marco Contiero, a spokesman for Greenpeace, told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

Read full, original article:ย Europe’s food fight shifts after GM crop vote

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-27-2026-11_47_30-AM-2
FDAโ€™s expedited drug reviews are hailed in some quarters but other approval practices are problematic
Screenshot-2026-05-01-at-1.29.41-PM
Viewpoint: What happens when whole grains meet modern food manufacturing? Labels donโ€™t tell the whole story.
Farmers can talk to plants
Farmers are a major source of misinformationโ€”about farming
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-13-2026-02_20_22-PM
Viewpoint: Misinformation infodemic? Why assessing evidence is so challengingย 
S
As vaccine rejectionism spreads, measles may be taking a more dangerous turn
Screenshot 2026-05-06 at 2.19
Vaccine shootout at the CDCย 
Screenshot-2026-04-20-at-2.26.27-PM
Viewpoint โ€” Food-fear world: The latest activist scientists campaign: Cancer-causing additives
What explains Homo sapiensโ€™ huge brains? Ancient climate change played a role
Viewpoint: Internal White House documents detail administrationโ€™s strategy to undermine climate science
ChatGPT-Image-May-7-2026-11_28_04-AM-2
โ€˜Conflict entrepreneursโ€™ are driving disinformation and shaping public opinion
ChatGPT-Image-May-6-2026-03_41_05-PM
โ€˜Protecting the integrity of scienceโ€™: Kennedyโ€™s FDA blocks release of taxpayer-funded studies finding COVID and shingles vaccines safe
Screenshot-2026-05-06-at-2.07.43-PM
Manufacturing a conspiracy: The timeline of howย  the White House embraced the fringe claim that scientists are being mysteriously murdered
Screenshot 2026-05-06 at 2.56
Singularity crisis ahead? Can super babies save us from rogue AI geniuses?
bigstock opioids on chalkboard with rol
GLP podcast: 'Safe injection sites': enabling drug addiction or saving lives?
Screenshot-2026-03-13-at-12.14.04-PM
The FDA wants to make many popular prescription drugs OTCโ€”a great idea. Hereโ€™s why itโ€™s unlikely to happen
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.