Will benefits of nanopesticides outweigh costs?

Stacey Harper is doggedly researching tiny, human-made substances called nanoparticles. The scientist at Oregon State University in Corvallis hopes to be able to identify which particle will be a boon and which a bane for farmers, consumers and the environment.

Nanoparticles, which are the size of molecules, are already used in numerous items from sunscreen to biomedical devices. Their minuscule size makes them efficient, but also unpredictable. Harper said the first nano-formulations of pesticides are quietly making their way onto agricultural fields, and she wants to know what happens next.

Harper said she thinks the vast majority of nanopesticides will not be toxicm, or at least no more toxic to non-target organisms than current pesticides.

By shrinking the size of individual nanopesticide droplets, there is broad consensus from industry to academia to the Environmental Protection Agency that the total amount of toxins sprayed on agricultural fields could be significantly reduced. Smaller droplets have a higher total-surface area, which offers overall greater contact with crop pests.

But, once they are sprayed on fields, will they clump on crops or slide through the soil into water bodies? Most worrisome, Harper said, is whether they will be readily taken up by organisms that aren’t pests, such as bees or fish, and how long they will persist in the environment.

Read full, original article: Nanopesticides illicit worry and hope

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Wave Crest Over Red Cross
Viewpoint: Here are the election-inspired Trump administration healthcare policy reversals expected in the coming months
Democratic Donkey Plowing at Sunset
Viewpoint: Democratic tsunami: As the red tide recedes, here are the most likely shifts in food and agricultural policy
p22_spraying_2
How climate change is driving increased pesticide usage
Blue Checklist in Centered Hand
Viewpoint: From Medicaid cuts to MAHA-backed anti-vaccine and chemical hysteria, voters reject Republicans’ science-skeptical agenda
Aerial Sprayer Over Gradient Fields
Farming, food, and chemicals: Post-midterms, the MAHA alliance between Democrats and MAGA Republicans is bruised but not cowed. What comes next?
Bayer Crop Circle in Golden Wheat
Making fertilizer from thin air: Bayer’s gene-editing innovation could dramatically cut chemical fertilizer use in growing food
Crumbling MAHA Stage Portrait
Cataloging the RFK Jr.-MAHA crushing midterm collapse
Microscopic IVF Egg Injection
With technical barriers to human embryo editing falling, ethical concerns escalate
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.