Rebranding genetic modification as ‘ethical crop breeding’

Genetic modification (GM) should be re-branded as ‘ethical crop breeding’ with the patented technology used for ‘the greater good’ rather than to feed the profits of multinational corporates.

That was according to outgoing NFU Scotland president Nigel Miller.

The issue of GM came up during a Question Time-style debate at the Scottish Agricultural Organisation Society (SAOS) conference.

Mr Miller said the moniker GM was one of the biggest issues.

“The Scottish Government will never go there,” he said. “What we need to talk about is ethical crop breeding.”

Mr Miller also suggested research institutes should hold the patented technology rights; many opposition groups fear the control big biotech companies have over farmers and markets.

Others on the panel, including SAOS director David Mitchell, also supported ‘re-branding’ the technology.

The need to use GM was ‘unquestionable’, Mr Mitchell said, citing the benefits for potato growers in particular.

However, James Withers, of Scotland Food and Drink, was not convinced. He admitted to having ‘changed my mind’ over the controversial science. He said GM would have a ‘critical role’ for commodity crops but that was not the market Scotland should be playing in.

He said: “In Scotland, let’s forget about producing commodities. Let’s go for added value. Going against the grain [by not using GM for example] could help us carve out a niche.”

Read full, original article: GM technology should be re-branded ‘ethical crop breeding’

Outbreak
Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

As Europe sees record coronavirus cases and deaths, Slovakia is testing its entire adult population. WSJ's Drew Hinshaw explains how ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
globalmethanebudget globalcarbonproject cropped x

Infographic: Cows cause climate change? Agriculture scientist says ‘belching bovines’ get too much blame

A recent interview by Caroline Stocks, a UK journalist who writes about food, agriculture and the environment, of air quality ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...
favicon

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend