Rebranding genetic modification as ‘ethical crop breeding’

| | February 10, 2015
This article or excerpt is included in the GLP’s daily curated selection of ideologically diverse news, opinion and analysis of biotechnology innovation.

Genetic modification (GM) should be re-branded as ‘ethical crop breeding’ with the patented technology used for ‘the greater good’ rather than to feed the profits of multinational corporates.

That was according to outgoing NFU Scotland president Nigel Miller.

The issue of GM came up during a Question Time-style debate at the Scottish Agricultural Organisation Society (SAOS) conference.

Mr Miller said the moniker GM was one of the biggest issues.

“The Scottish Government will never go there,” he said. “What we need to talk about is ethical crop breeding.”

Mr Miller also suggested research institutes should hold the patented technology rights; many opposition groups fear the control big biotech companies have over farmers and markets.

Others on the panel, including SAOS director David Mitchell, also supported ‘re-branding’ the technology.

The need to use GM was ‘unquestionable’, Mr Mitchell said, citing the benefits for potato growers in particular.

However, James Withers, of Scotland Food and Drink, was not convinced. He admitted to having ‘changed my mind’ over the controversial science. He said GM would have a ‘critical role’ for commodity crops but that was not the market Scotland should be playing in.

He said: “In Scotland, let’s forget about producing commodities. Let’s go for added value. Going against the grain [by not using GM for example] could help us carve out a niche.”

Read full, original article: GM technology should be re-branded ‘ethical crop breeding’

Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
a a b b a f ac a

Video: Death by COVID: The projected grim toll in historical context

The latest statistics, as of July 10, show COVID-19-related deaths in U.S. are just under 1,000 per day nationally, which is ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
types of oak trees

Infographic: Power of evolution? How oak trees came to dominate North American forests

Over the course of some 56 million years, oaks, which all belong to the genus Quercus, evolved from a single undifferentiated ...
biotechnology worker x

Can GMOs rescue threatened plants and crops?

Some scientists and ecologists argue that humans are in the midst of an "extinction crisis" — the sixth wave of ...
food globe x

Are GMOs necessary to feed the world?

Experts estimate that agricultural production needs to roughly double in the coming decades. How can that be achieved? ...
eating gmo corn on the cob x

Are GMOs safe?

In 2015, 15 scientists and activists issued a statement, "No Scientific consensus on GMO safety," in the journal Environmental Sciences ...
Screen Shot at PM

Charles Benbrook: Agricultural economist and consultant for the organic industry and anti-biotechnology advocacy groups

Independent scientists rip Benbrook's co-authored commentary in New England Journal calling for reassessment of dangers of all GMO crops and herbicides ...
Screen Shot at PM

ETC Group: ‘Extreme’ biotechnology critic campaigns against synthetic biology and other forms of ‘extreme genetic engineering’

The ETC Group is an international environmental non-governmental organization (NGO) based in Canada whose stated purpose is to monitor "the impact of emerging technologies and ...
Share via
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend