We need to reevaluate how we define depression

med depression

In the wake of the Germanwings tragedy, mental health advocates are deeply concerned about misleading generalizations that may increase the stigma surrounding depression and make people less likely to seek the help that they need. But there’s been little discussion of perhaps the most misleading generalization of all: the label “depression” itself.

What we call depression seems to be a grab bag of conditions involving different parts of the brain’s circuitry. And while it’s still early days, a fresh understanding of depression’s diversity should lead to better treatments.

About 7 percent of U.S. adults experience at least one episode of major depression each year, according to the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). In terms of how many healthy years it takes from people’s lives, depression is the most damaging of all the mental and behavioral disorders. Yet according to the latest research, major depression isn’t a distinct disorder after all — despite being listed as such in the psychiatrists’ bible, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.

“When we throw around the label ‘depression,’ we can often be referring to very different things,” Daniel Foti, a clinical psychologist at Purdue University in Indiana, told BuzzFeed News.

Some of the confusion arises from the fact that depression is in many cases a secondary symptom of another mental disorder — about three quarters of people who meet the DSM’s criteria for major depression have at least one other psychiatric condition. But even “pure” cases of major depression can manifest themselves very differently: Some people lose interest in activities they once found pleasurable, while others become unusually sensitive to negative experiences. Still others become irritable and angry.

Read full, original article: Depression Isn’t What You Think It Is

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Picture1
The FDA couldn’t find a vaccine safety crisis, so it buried its own research
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-16-2026-02_56_53-PM
Financial incentives, over diagnosis, and weak oversight: Autism claims are driving up Medicare costs
Screenshot-2026-05-19-at-11.23.34-AM
West-originated vaccine disinformation sparks murders of health care workers across Africa
Screenshot-2026-05-08-at-11.55.47-AM
Anti-vax activists falsely blame COVID vaccines for the rising U.S. cancer rate among younger people.
Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-12.21.32-PM
Viewpoint: Why the retracted Monsanto glyphosate study doesn’t change the science—the world’s most popular herbicide is safe 
ChatGPT-Image-May-12-2026-11_27_01-AM-2
AI likely to improve health care, research shows—but not for blacks and ethnic minorities
ChatGPT-Image-May-7-2026-12_32_36-PM
Viewpoint: The state of U.S. vaccine policy? Dismal nationally, but some states are stepping up.
modi visit sikkim
Viewpoint: Indian PM wants farmers to switch to 50% organic. It would take at least 10 years, likely won’t work, and isn’t more sustainable
Screenshot-2026-05-18-at-12.57.12-PM
Viewpoint—‘Technology is pulling us apart’: Environmental, political, and economic
Screenshot-2026-04-13-at-1.39.26-PM
Viewpoint: ‘Safer for children?’ Stonyfield yogurt under fire for deceptive organic marketing
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.