Is there still hope for coral reefs damaged by human activity?

Humans bear much of the responsibility for the steady decimation of coral reefs. The marine ecosystems have been overfished, dissolved by their increasingly acidic surroundings and cooked in the warming waters of the world’s oceans. Roughly 20 percent of coral reefs have already collapsed beyond recovery, and half of those that remain are poised to follow. With billions of dollars in ecosystem services and tourism revenue at stake, protecting reefs has become a top priority around the globe, but little research has been done to find out how long it will take these ecosystems to recover.

Researchers report in the journal Nature that protected reefs could bounce back in as little as 35 years on average, but that the most heavily degraded reefs may take as many as 59 years to fully recover.

To settle on these timelines, the researchers looked at data from 832 coral reefs spanning 64 countries and territories around the world. They used the population density of reef fish around relatively untouched reefs to estimate the global baseline density of reef biomass and compared that baseline to marine protected reefs where fishing had been banned to get the rate of recovery.

Luckily, MacNeil and his colleagues found that even partial fishing restrictions could help save endangered reefs. The study showed that reefs with at least some form of fishing restrictions—such as bans on specific gear or limits on which types of fish can be caught—had 27 percent more biomass recovery than reefs without any restrictions at all. That’s good news for countries that can’t afford to enforce total restrictions.

Read full original article: A Long Road to Recovery for Coral Reefs


Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

As Europe sees record coronavirus cases and deaths, Slovakia is testing its entire adult population. WSJ's Drew Hinshaw explains how ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
globalmethanebudget globalcarbonproject cropped x

Infographic: Cows cause climate change? Agriculture scientist says ‘belching bovines’ get too much blame

A recent interview by Caroline Stocks, a UK journalist who writes about food, agriculture and the environment, of air quality ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend