Neonicotinoid ban cost UK farmers $33 million, yet no evidence it saves bees

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.

Since December 2013, the EU has banned the use of three types of neonicotinoid pesticides, believing — thanks to a number of studies — that they were responsible for large-scale honeybee demise.

Unfortunately, there was no system put in place to assess whether the ban would have a measurable impact on honeybee populations. A pan-European study on honeybee mortality covering the years 2012 to 2014 was conducted, but wasn’t designed to determine to what extent pesticide use vs other factors was the cause of bee mortality.

That said, there was a noticeable decrease in overwintering colony mortality rates in 2013 to 2014 across Europe as compared with 2012 to 2013, but in some areas, the mortality rate remains high.

“The only conclusion you could draw from this [pan-European] study is that it is not pesticides alone [that is responsible for bee deaths],” a representative of the European Commission tells Modern Farmer in an email. (We were asked to not specifically name this rep.)

Related article:  Bees pollinate 1/3 of our food? Entomologist debunks 6 pervasive pollinator myths

To make matters even more confusing, the UK partially lifted the ban on two neonicotinoids this past July for 120 days. The National Farmers’ Union of England and Wales (NFU) had earlier done an “emergency application” of the chemicals on rapeseed crops there.

According to Rural Business Research, the ban has forced UK farmers to use alternate chemicals to fight off cabbage stem flea beetle, a major crop pest of rapeseed. The RBR study stated that the financial costs to farmers was nearly £22 million ($33 million U.S.) for alternative pesticide use, lost crops, and replanting costs.

The EU’s ban is up for review at the end of the year. Hopefully, the European Commission will dig deeper into bee mortality and land on a more definitive explanation for their diminished numbers.

Read full, original post: Ban of Neonicotinoids in UK Cost Farmers Millions

Outbreak
Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

As Europe sees record coronavirus cases and deaths, Slovakia is testing its entire adult population. WSJ's Drew Hinshaw explains how ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
globalmethanebudget globalcarbonproject cropped x

Infographic: Cows cause climate change? Agriculture scientist says ‘belching bovines’ get too much blame

A recent interview by Caroline Stocks, a UK journalist who writes about food, agriculture and the environment, of air quality ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...
favicon

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend