Sure Genomics whole-genome direct-to-consumer test pushes regulatory limits

AAEAAQAAAAAAAANpAAAAJDYwOGNhMGE LWMyNGQtNGQ ZS hNjQwLTA ZjMxNmVlNGU MA

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.

Sure Genomics, a startup based in Utah, launched a genetic testing service today that costs a whopping $2,500 upfront, with an additional $150 subscription fee that guarantees DNA analysis updates every six months. The price is unusually high for a direct-to-consumer genetics company, since 23andMe and Ancestry offer genetics reports for $199 and $99, respectively. But Sure Genomics says it’s worth it; customers who pay the fee will get their entire genome sequenced, and unlike others, the startup says it won’t sell anonymized genetic information to third parties to turn a profit.

But from a regulatory standpoint, Sure Genomics is treading on thin ice. The FDA has warned similar companies about telling people their disease risk or how their bodies might respond to a drug. Sure Genomics plans to deliver exactly those kinds of results — without getting clearance from the FDA first.

It’s been three years since the now-famous genetics company 23andMe first received a warning letter from the FDA telling them to stop marketing its Personal Genome Service. At the time, the FDA said that some of the intended uses for the service — uses like determining a person’s drug response or their genetic risk for breast cancer — were “concerning.” The FDA feared patients could be put at risk if they received incorrect test results, or if they didn’t understand the results they got.

Read full, original post: Sure Genomics wants to sell private genetic profiles for $2,500, but it’s really testing the FDA

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot-2026-10-07-at-2.00.02-PM
9 wellness myths busted
Concerned-Farmer-at-Golden-Hour
GAHA: The corporate-created “healthier America” movement challenging what it claims is MAHA misinformation about modern farming, chemicals, and food
AI Doctor with a Digital Neural Head
Utah becomes first state to empower AI to bypass doctors and prescribe certain drugs
AI-Force-Uniform-Insignia-Close-Up
Trump wants an AI Force like Space Force, but that could make AI’s risks harder to manage
Screenshot-2026-10-06-at-11.13.59-AM
RFK Jr.’s plan to curb America’s appetite for ultra-processed foods and artificial dyes blocked by the White House
Screenshot-2026-09-22-at-12.26.15-PM
‘Forever chemical’ concerns: Separating hysteria from reasonable concern in the debate over PFAS danger
Screenshot-2026-10-08-at-2.32.00-PM
Abortion rights opponents outraged after FDA says its “safety review” of the already-found-safe mifepristone abortion pill will continue into 2027
Screenshot-2026-10-06-at-2.36.47-PM
Is organic farming really more sustainable? 100 recent studies say ‘no’
Screenshot-2026-09-28-at-11.26.17-AM
Viewpoint: Wellness movement activists reposition nicotine from a killer addictive drug into a cure-all for brain ills
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.