The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.
Sometimes it pays to see what agriculture’s antagonists are saying, even if it is the same tired drum beat.
Such is the case with the story on the Environmental Working Group’s 2016 “Dirty Dozen” list related to produce and pesticides.
. . . .
Implied in the report is the notion that any pesticide residue at all is bad, which if that were the case we could toss conventional produce into the same waste bin as much of our organic produce as organically-approved pesticide residues can also be detected.
You’ve got to dig deep in the report to find where there were a few samples found with residues that violated regulatory standards. In the case of strawberries, the report says that five of the nearly 7,000 produce samples tested by the USDA in 2014 exceeded federal tolerances. Nine samples were said to contain residues for pesticides not labeled for strawberries.
Share this article
While there is no excuse for such occurrences it’s still hardly the “smoking gun” to suggest we stop eating fruits and vegetables.
The fear-mongering that helps fill evening newscasts and makes for banner headlines is more about money than it is protecting the public interest. According to the website activistfacts.com EWG in 2012 reported over $3.4 million in assets and more than $6.7 million in revenue, double the revenue they had in 2009.
Fear is profitable. Just how much the tactics of activist groups like EWG are raising our food prices is hard to quantify, but it could be more than we would imagine.
Read full, original post: Activists profit well by peddling fear
