Fossilized plants from Neanderthals’ teeth contradict accepted theory of their diet

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.

Neanderthals were ancient, compared to us. They lived long before civilisation, before even the most prehistoric dentists began experimenting with ways to tackle tooth decay.

So if you were to guess at what kind of teeth they had, you might expect the worst: a mouth full of rotting and missing teeth.

It is becoming clearer that this was far from the case. One recent study actually suggests that Neanderthals lost fewer teeth than humans with equivalent diets. What’s more, another new analysis offers a hint that they used toothpicks to keep their teeth clean.

If you do not brush your teeth, plaque builds up and transforms into a hardened substance called dental calculus. This accumulates into a little hollow between your teeth and gums. The same was true of Neanderthals.

Until recently, researchers studying ancient teeth simply scrubbed off the calculus. “They thought it was just a waste product,” says Karen Hardy, ICREA research professor at the Autonomous University of Barcelona in Spain.

However, this calculus has revealed unexpected surprises. In the last 10 years, Hardy and others have shown that it contains micro-fossils of ancient plants.

These tell us in great detail what our close relatives ate. For instance, we have evidence that they ate edible grass, nuts and legumes.

Read full, original post: What Neanderthals’ healthy teeth tell us about their minds

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

wuhan institute of virology main entrance
​​COVID lab leak? Making a case that the Wuhan market origins theory is wrong
Screenshot-2026-06-18-at-11.41.51-AM
Viewpoint—Protecting baloney science: Far right senators move to protect the phony homeopathy industry
Screenshot-2026-06-17-at-9.44.03-AM
Viewpoint: Embryos are becoming the newest battleground of love, loss, and legal uncertainty
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-9-2026-01_11_37-PM
Turmeric supplements: More risks than benefits
Screenshot-2026-06-16-at-10.02.22-PM
Viewpoint: ‘Industrial food’ primer—Challenging the dangerous delusions of the alternative food movement
Screenshot-2026-06-17-at-11.57.12-AM
Viewpoint: Raw milk and the myth of safety—ProPublica exposes the growing anti-homogenization movement
Screenshot-2026-06-18-at-2.52.05-PM
Activist organization accuses Trump of protecting methane-generating stripper wells to benefit billionaire and donor Jeffrey Hildebrand 

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.