Why don’t we have GMO oats?

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.

So, why are there no GMO oats? There are a bunch of reasons, but the main one is, not surprisingly, money. There simply aren’t enough oat farmers in the world, or enough oats grown, to create sufficient demand to justify the incredibly expensive research that goes into developing genetically modified seeds. . . .

. . . .

In a perfect world, that wouldn’t be the case. Oats are the most nutritious of the big grains. . . . The World Health Organization says they’re about as good a source of protein as meat, milk and eggs. . . .

Nevertheless, demand for oats has been falling for nearly a century. . . . That’s in part because oats aren’t a particularly efficient or profitable crop. . . .

That’s just the kind of problem that could conceivably be solved by genetic engineering aimed at increasing yields. . . .

. . . .

And there’s another barrier: the oat genome itself. Commercial oats contain six chromosomes in their genomes, making them particularly difficult — and expensive — to modify. . . .

Read full, original post: Why There Are No GMO Oats (and Probably Never Will Be)

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Crumbling MAHA Stage Portrait
Cataloging the RFK Jr.-MAHA crushing midterm collapse
Microscopic IVF Egg Injection
With technical barriers to human embryo editing falling, ethical concerns escalate
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Blue Checklist in Centered Hand
Viewpoint: From Medicaid cuts to MAHA-backed anti-vaccine and chemical hysteria, voters reject Republicans’ science-skeptical agenda
Picture1
Viewpoint: How badly is the U.S. food-safety net fraying? FDA’s bungled handling of the tainted lettuce crisis deepens concerns over cuts to disease tracking and response
Smiling-Woman-Over-Teal-Abstract-Shapes
Viewpoint: RFK Jr.’s latest foray into junk science: Even Kennedy’s hand-picked NIH director balks at appointment of crackpot mental health director
Reaching Through the Woven Sky
Challenging genetic modification rejectionists: Our evolving food system has relied on science for thousands of years
Hipster eugenics: better babies for billionaires
Viewpoint: “Positive eugenics”: Reviving a movement reviled and condemned for a century
Bayer Crop Circle in Golden Wheat
Making fertilizer from thin air: Bayer’s gene-editing innovation could dramatically cut chemical fertilizer use in growing food
Screenshot-2026-10-29-at-11.18.34-AM
Viewpoint: ‘Just the flu’: Skipping your child’s flu shot could be a fatal mistake
Screenshot 2026-11-04 at 12.02
Ever wonder why AI can so easily be duped into manufacturing health misinformation?    
Screenshot-2026-11-02-at-11.34.28-AM
Farmers are collateral damage in the PFAS “forever chemicals” crossfire. Here’s what they need to know.
Neon Genome_ Fetal Dreamscape
The race to genetically engineer babies
Screenshot-2026-11-03-at-12.31.18-PM
Gene editing once viewed with suspicion by UK  farmers, upwards of 90% now open to their sustainability benefits
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.