VT law made GMO labeling inevitable, Senate version is reasonable compromise

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.

. . . . [I]t appears the stars may be aligning such that a nationwide mandatory GMO labeling will become a reality.

. . . .

. . . . Neither side got everything they wanted, but . . . this is a law that provides some form of labeling, which will hopefully shelve this issue and allow us to move on to more important things. . .


I’m sympathetic to the arguments made by folks who . . . oppose mandatory labeling on the premise that our laws shouldn’t be stigmatizing biotechnology.  . . . I agree the law is unhelpful insofar as giving consumers useful information about safety or environmental impact. . . .

But, here’s the deal.  The Vermont law was soon going into effect anyway. The question wasn’t whether a mandatory labeling law was going into effect but rather what kind. . . .

The worst economic consequences of mandatory labeling would have come about from . . . labels that were most likely to be perceived by consumers as a “skull and cross bones”.   In my mind the current Senate bill avoided this worst case scenario while giving those consumers who really want to know about GMO content a means for making that determination. . . .

Read full, original post: Mandatory GMO Labeling Closer to Reality

Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
GLP Podcasts
Infographic: Here’s where GM crops are grown around the world today

Infographic: Here’s where GM crops are grown around the world today

Do you know where biotech crops are grown in the world? This updated ISAAA infographics show where biotech crops were ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
glp menu logo outlined

Newsletter Subscription

Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend