Who is best qualified to regulate gene editing?

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.

No other technology like the recently developed “genome editing” has taken the world by storm in the annals of modern biotechnology.

The beauty of genome editing is that without adding an extra piece of DNA, the genetic make-up can be altered[.] As such, leading regulatory authorities in the US and the EU have declared that genome-edited organisms…do not come under any biotech regulation.

Critics of biotechnology assert that all products of these technologies are nothing but “hidden GMOs”…and are pushing to bring them under the GMO umbrella. Developers of these technologies…claim that regulations will cripple innovation as it happened with GMOs. India is the worst sufferer of anti-biotech activism, whereas neighbouring Bangladesh has gone ahead with a variety of GM crops to improve its agriculture.

There are very good experts in science and technology and social sciences who can address [these ethical and safety questions]. Instead, a bunch of anti-tech ignoramuses take centre stage just because they have the decibel power, and politicise the whole debate.

Read full, original post: Genome Editing: The Benefits And The Ethics

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

d-b
Blocked arteries, kidney stones, nausea, constipation, fatigue: Long list of health problems caused by too much vitamin D 
Screenshot-PM-24
Viewpoint: The herbicide glyphosate isn’t perfect. Banning it would be far worse.
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-27-2026-11_27_05-AM
The myths of “process”: What science says about the “dangers’ of synthetic products and ultra-processed foods
Screenshot-2026-04-29-at-11.31.42-AM
Dad brains: Only women undergo bodily changes during and after childbirth? Think again.
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-3-2026-01_17_14-PM
MAHA wellness influencers deride proven anxiety medications, tout lifestyle fixes
png-pill-omega-Supp-fish-oil
Fish oil supplements for brain injuries probably don’t work 
circular-bioeconomy-should-focus-on-sustainable-wellbeing
GLP podcast: What's wrong with 'doomsday' environmentalism? It's false.
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-28-2026-12_46_14-PM-2
Kennedy has quietly stopped touting problematic raw milk. Health concerns aren’t why
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-22-2026-11_06_18-AM
Wellness influencer nonsense: No, nicotine does not boost cognition and productivity, but it can damage your health 
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-29-2026-11_04_44-AM-2
Anti-vaccine activists are now the majority in RFK, Jr.’s CDC Vaccine Panel
ChatGPT-Image-Feb-16-2026-01_04_32-PM
Raw milk myth wake-up call
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.