Large genetic database reveals how our individual DNA differs

ExAC…is a compendium of genetic information that…[is] so big that it is giving scientists a much more realistic vision of how we differ from each other genetically.

For doctors like [Robert] Green, [ExAC]’s proving valuable as a way to find false positives. He has had the pleasure of telling some of his patients that a genetic diagnosis they got years ago is no longer a cause for concern.

But a set of new papers…shows that false positives are just one of many things that it can illuminate. It is also helping scientists identify new genetic variants and understand secrets about the fundamental biology that we all share.

The new study showed that broken genes are surprisingly common. Each ExAC volunteer had, on average, 85 genes in which one copy is broken…Different people had different broken genes…But when the ExAC researchers catalogued all the genes in ExAC, they found that 3,230 genes were almost never broken.

“These are genes you can’t mess with,” said Daniel MacArthur…

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis. Read full, original post: We’re all different in our DNA. We’ve finally starting to understand when those differences matter

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-04-14-at-11.11.06-AM
‘Turbo cancer’ or mRNA cancer cure? Strategies to counter misinformation
Screenshot 2025-07-30 at 10.48
Can gene editing eliminate Down syndrome? Scientists have done it in lab-grown cells
Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-12.21.32-PM
Viewpoint: Why the retracted Monsanto glyphosate study doesn’t change the science—the world’s most popular herbicide is safe 
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
ChatGPT-Image-May-22-2026-10_56_42-AM-2
‘It’s not super useful’: As wariness about AI grows, Trump proposes rollback of healthcare safeguards
ChatGPT Image May 10, 2026, 08_16_59 PM 2
Overmedicalization? RFK Jr.’s antidepressant crackdown raises conflict questions over his fee stake in Wisner Baum, the tort firm built on suing drug makers

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.