…
“If we’re going to be producing genetically modified babies, we are all too likely to find ourselves in a world where those babies are perceived to be biologically superior….” [Marcy] Darnovsky [executive director of the Center for Genetics and Society] says. “That could lead to all sorts of social disasters. It’s not a world I want to live in.”
…
First, this is very early days and none of the embryos edited by Lanner will become children, so bloviating against designer babies is a tad premature. Second, and most importantly, note that Darnovsky is against the technology even if it’s safe. In other words, it is supposedly ethical to prevent parents from using a technology that would spare their children of horrible diseases and…enable them to have stronger bodies, more effective immune systems and more nimble brains.
The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis. Read full, original post: ‘Designer Baby’ Scaremongering Never Gets Old, Does It?
