Pesticides and food: It’s not a black and white issue

Special 6-part series, Jan 22 - Feb 6

FIRST ARTICLE: Has pesticide use decreased over the last 40 years?

Will new GMO labeling law apply to CRISPR crops?

| | September 27, 2016

…Earlier this year, the USDA gave the greenlight to CRISPR mushrooms engineered to not brown. It wrote that because the new mushroom “does not contain any introduced genetic material” it isn’t… subject to the agency’s GMO regulations.

But a new bill quietly passed and signed into law at the end of July seeks to change that.

The law…[defines] “bioengineered” as such:

(A) that contains genetic material that has been modified through in vitro recombinant deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) techniques; and
(B) for which the modification could not otherwise be obtained through conventional breeding or found in nature.

The law, in other words… significantly expands the definition of what we consider “genetically modified.”

Under the new regulations, for example, the non-browning CRISPR mushroom might be considered exempt, since the gene deletion is similar to a mutation achieved… through “conventional” breeding. But it seems far more likely that the law would apply, because the mushrooms are indeed modified in vitro using recombinant DNA techniques.

. . . .

The new law… further muddles the definition of genetically modified… broadening it to potentially include anything with genes that have been tinkered with in the lab.

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis. Read full, original post: Here comes the next GMO food war

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion, and analysis. Click the link above to read the full, original article.

1 thought on “Will new GMO labeling law apply to CRISPR crops?”

  1. If there’s a constant in biology it’s that Nature continues to surprise. DNA was thought to be static – until the discovery of transposons and horizontal gene transfer. Intergenic DNA was thought to be ‘junk’ – until the discovery of expression elements and non-coding RNAs. DNA sequence was thought to be the only mode of inheritance – until the discovery of epigentics.

    Defining something as ‘not found in nature’ is probably premature. Singling out biology for obsessive scrutiny even seems excessive considering how our human existence is surrounded by – and often dependent on – all sorts of non-biological stuff that is ‘not found in nature.’

Leave a Comment

News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.

Send this to a friend