Four expert panels say data don’t support IARC’s classification of glyphosate as carcinogenic

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) published a monograph in 2015 concluding that glyphosate is โ€œprobably carcinogenic to humansโ€ (Group 2A) based on limited evidence in humans and sufficient evidence in experimental animals. It was also concluded that there was strong evidence of genotoxicity and oxidative stress. Four Expert Panels have been convened for the purpose of conducting a detailed critique of the evidence in light of IARCโ€™s assessment and to review all relevant information pertaining to glyphosate exposure, animal carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, and epidemiologic studies. …[F]ollowing the review of the totality of the evidence, the Panels concluded that the data do not support IARCโ€™s conclusion that glyphosate is a โ€œprobable human carcinogenโ€ and, consistent with previous regulatory assessments, further concluded that glyphosate is unlikely to pose a carcinogenic risk to humans.

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis. Read full, original post:ย A review of the carcinogenic potential of glyphosate by four independent expert panels and comparison to the IARC assessment

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT Image May 26, 2026, 08_42_17 AM (1)
Viewpoint: Greenpeace and poison: How environmental advocacy groups rely on compliant (and often ignorant) journalists to spread disinformation and spark litigation
Screenshot 2025-07-30 at 10.48
Can gene editing eliminate Down syndrome? Scientists have done it in lab-grown cells
Screenshot-2026-05-28-at-1.36.28-PM
Viewpoint: Can mRNA research survive the Trump administration?
Screenshot 2025-11-18 at 3.45
Viewpointโ€”GMOs and sustainability: Why buying organic foods is the least environmentally-sensitive food choiceโ€”without offering any health benefits
ChatGPT-Image-May-26-2026-07_51_21-AM-2
Viewpoint: There are more than 1,000 chemicals in a cup of coffeeโ€”including many substances that can cause cancer. Why isnโ€™t it banned?
Screenshot-2026-06-02-at-11.59.11-AM
Magnifica Humanitas: Popeโ€™s encyclical broadside against AI naivete and overreach
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-2-2026-11_39_58-AM
Viewpoint: Who is RFK, Jr.โ€™s newly-appointed CDC senior counselor, Sara Brenner โ€” Vaccine skeptic and self-proclaimed โ€œMAHA momโ€
Picture1
Sounds we canโ€™t hear โ€” the hidden planetary signals behind science, fear, and misinformation
ChatGPT Image May 28, 2026, 08_16_38 PM
Viewpoint: Why the EPA mismeasures cancer risk of chemicals and what should be done to fix it
Screenshot-2026-04-14-at-11.11.06-AM
โ€˜Turbo cancerโ€™ or mRNA cancer cure? Strategies to counter misinformation
tick-DNA
GLP podcast: Spread meat allergy with gene-edited ticks? Bioethicists pose vile โ€˜thought experimentโ€™
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.