Viewpoint—The end of ‘ivory tower science’: What does that even mean, and what comes next

We built American science like a skyscraper — centralized, concentrated, dependent on a single foundation. More than half of university research budgets flow from one federal source. Indirect cost structures can be weaponized by a Friday-afternoon policy change. On April 24, the White House terminated all 22 members of the National Science Board in a single email, leaving the agency that funds American basic research with no board, no director, and no deputy. …

Science built an ivory tower when we needed a garden. The tower is beautiful — I mean that. It contains real knowledge and hard-won discoveries. But a tower is vertical, singular, closed. A garden is horizontal, distributed, open. And a garden is resilient precisely because no single point of failure can kill the whole thing.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Nowhere is it written that science must occur only on college campuses or in the halls of academic medicine. Science happens in barbershops and living rooms, in basements and farmer’s fields. The wisdom we produce as a community is what knits the enterprise together — not the overhead rates, not the agency letterheads, and certainly not the approval of any particular administration.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT Image May 26, 2026, 08_42_17 AM (1)
Viewpoint: Greenpeace and poison: How environmental advocacy groups rely on compliant (and often ignorant) journalists to spread disinformation and spark litigation
Screenshot 2025-07-30 at 10.48
Can gene editing eliminate Down syndrome? Scientists have done it in lab-grown cells
Screenshot-2026-05-28-at-1.36.28-PM
Viewpoint: Can mRNA research survive the Trump administration?
Screenshot-2026-06-02-at-11.59.11-AM
Magnifica Humanitas: Pope’s encyclical broadside against AI naivete and overreach
Screenshot 2025-11-18 at 3.45
Viewpoint—GMOs and sustainability: Why buying organic foods is the least environmentally-sensitive food choice—without offering any health benefits
ChatGPT-Image-May-26-2026-07_51_21-AM-2
Viewpoint: There are more than 1,000 chemicals in a cup of coffee—including many substances that can cause cancer. Why isn’t it banned?
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-2-2026-11_39_58-AM
Viewpoint: Who is RFK, Jr.’s newly-appointed CDC senior counselor, Sara Brenner — Vaccine skeptic and self-proclaimed “MAHA mom”
Picture1
Sounds we can’t hear — the hidden planetary signals behind science, fear, and misinformation
ChatGPT Image May 28, 2026, 08_16_38 PM
Viewpoint: Why the EPA mismeasures cancer risk of chemicals and what should be done to fix it
Screenshot-2026-04-14-at-11.11.06-AM
‘Turbo cancer’ or mRNA cancer cure? Strategies to counter misinformation
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.