‘Three-parent’ IVF: Why the controversy, why the success

s x
[Three-parent IVF] is rapidly progressing, causing widespread discussion on the ethics and social concerns of such a procedure. Although the donor egg is said to contribute only 1% to the genetic makeup of the child, when examining the genetic material of these children there are still three identifiable genetic parents, which opponents to the technology argue could cause the child psychological and physical damage.

…

There are two different types; spindle transfer and pronuclear transfer….

Spindle transfer: This technique takes the unfertilized mother’s egg (containing abnormal mitochondria) and the unfertilized donor’s egg (with healthy mitochondria), removes the spindle and other chromosomes from the mother’s and transfers them to the donated egg. This reconstituted egg is then fertilized with sperm from the father. Pronuclear transfer: Both the mother’s egg (containing abnormal mitochondria) and the donated egg (with normal mitochondria) are fertilized with the father’s sperm before the mother’s pro-nuclei is removed and transferred into the donor’s egg. It is then implanted into the mother’s uterus.

Mitochondrial transfer passes on genetic changes from one generation to another. That raises ethical concerns because any unexpected problems caused by the procedure could affect people who are not yet born, and so cannot give their consent to have the treatment.

The average IVF success rates using the woman’s own eggs (green line) and using donor eggs (blue line).

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion, and analysis. Read full, original post: IVF babies: Easy as 1, 2…3?

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-10-2026-10_36_07-AM
Viewpoint: Even lousy scientific articles can shield authors when they hype dubious health claims and products
Screenshot-2026-10-01-at-10.52.08-AM
Non-browning CRISPR gene-edited bananas move one step closer to British markets
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-23-2026-02_36_39-PM
Viewpoint: After firing the entire National Science Board, Trump reshapes funding initiatives. Here’s the good and the bad.
generated-1790707585414
Facts & Fallacies podcast: America's health care system is broken. A doctor explains how to fix it
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-21-2026-03_15_09-PM
Viewpoint: Chipotle-inspired lesson: 10,000 sick customers suggest that processed foods can be safer than fresh ones
Screenshot-2026-09-22-at-10.54.12-AM
‘They misunderstand science’: Research attempting to tie autism to changes in the gut microbiome comes under fire
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-21-2026-11_21_39-AM
Viewpoint: Food cults: Online ‘nutrition communities’ can pose unique dangers
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.