Environmental Working Group’s ‘dirty’ marketing serves ‘big organic’ donors, not consumers


For each of the last twenty years, an organization called the Environmental Working Group has issued what it calls a “Dirty Dozen List.” It names crops it claims to have high pesticide residues and recommends that consumers purchase organic versions of these crops.

[Editor’s note: Read the GLP’s profile on the Environmental Working Group here.]

They base their list on a seriously distorted interpretation of a taxpayer-funded testing program called the PDP (Pesticide Data Program, USDA). What the PDP actually documents is that our food supply is extremely safe. EWG has repeatedly been called out for promoting this science-free list and for the counter-productive effect it is having on produce consumption by Americans. Yet, EWG persists in employing this strategy as a means of fundraising. Presumably it also serves the interests of their corporate funders in the organic food industry (see list below).  Note that these are very large, processed food players with only one produce company in the list.

List of corporate partner funders from the EWG website

In its latest campaign, EWG is singling out a few crops for added demonization – notably spinach. They highlight certain specific chemicals that were detected in spinach samples by the USDA in 2015. I have looked in detail at this same, publicly available data. It turns out that 7% of the 2015 spinach samples were organic. The very same chemicals that EWG chose to talk about were found on those organic samples. As with virtually all of the residues found on all crops, the quantities that the USDA analytical chemists found were at very low levels – well below any possible level for health concern. Still, it is ironic that the same flawed logic that EWG uses to scare consumers away from perfectly safe conventional spinach says that they should also avoid the organic alternative.

Experts agree that one of the best things we can do for our health is to consume a lot of fruits and vegetables. Sadly, all too few Americans do that. Spinach is one of the more popular vegetables that can help move consumers in the right direction, particularly since it has become available as a convenient fresh, pre-washed option. Discouraging consumption of any kind of spinach is a notably irresponsible thing to do, particularly through disinformation. An industry group that represents both conventional and organic produce companies (and many are both) offers an on-line calculator using the USDA’s data and legitimate toxicological information. With this tool consumers can visualize just how safe products like spinach actually are. For instance, a child could safely eat up to 310 servings of spinach a day without negative effects from the trace chemicals on that crop.

As I’ve written, organic and conventional produce are actually quite similar when it comes to the presence of low levels of pesticide residues. Because EWG singled out spinach in its recent fund raising email campaign I thought it would be worthwhile to get into the details for that crop. For instance, EWG focuses on the synthetic pyrethroid insecticide, permethrin, which it calls a “Neurotoxic bug killer.” That sounds scary, but pyrethroids all have the same mode of action as the natural product called pyrethrin derived from Chrysanthemums (pyrethrin is used on organic crops).  As a class the pyrethroids are only slightly toxic to mammals and are considered safe enough to be in many household, garden and pet products sold to consumers.  One of the synthetic versions, Permethrin, is among the most used crop protection agents on spinach to prevent damage from caterpillar pests and infestations with aphids. These are not things we would like to find in our salads!

The USDA detected an average of 0.8 parts per million of permethrin on the 2015 conventional spinach samples. That is only 4.2% of the conservative tolerance set by the EPA, meaning it isn’t even close to something to worry about. On the organic samples from the same season, the USDA detected an average of 0.9 parts per million permethrin– essentially the same level as with conventional.

EWG also calls out the fact that traces of DDT and its metabolites were found in some spinach samples. These are unfortunate, long-term soil contaminants still slowly decomposing decades after that old product was banned. Their presence is certainly not related to whether the current spinach crop is grown conventionally or under the organic rules. Fortunately, the levels are tiny – seven parts per billion for the conventional and 11 parts per billion for the organic. These are only 1-2% of the level that the EPA considers to be of concern.

Permethrin and DDT are the products detected on spinach that the EWG chose to talk about. There were residues of 30 other synthetic pesticides on the organic spinach in 2015. The USDA does not test for at least two dozen other organic-approved pesticides that are used on spinach (biocontrol agents, mineral compounds, natural product chemicals). None of this means that organic spinach is “dirty.” Conventional spinach isn’t “dirty” either. What is “dirty” is the tactic is telling consumers they need to buy organic because of residue concerns without acknowledging that the organic products have similar, low-level residues.

In my opinion the “Dirty Dozen” should refer to the eleven big-organic companies that support the EWG and the EWG itself.

A version of this article appeared at Forbes as “Is Conventional Produce Dirty? No, But The Marketing Tactics Of Big Organic Are” and has been republished here with permission from the author and the original publisher. 

Steve Savage is an agricultural scientist (plant pathology) who has worked for Colorado State University, DuPont (fungicide development), Mycogen (biocontrol development), and for the past 13 years as an independent consultant. His blogging website is Applied Mythology. You can follow him on Twitter @grapedoc.

For more background on the Genetic Literacy Project, read GLP on Wikipedia

  • Masum Naqvi

    I found this article to be misleading. Literal boat load of crap from a person blinded by his agendas. Pesticides even in trace amounts are harmful. Humans are not guinea pigs to test long term effects of Neuro toxins in trace amounts. Pesticides negatively effects the whole planet not just the person consuming it. Also conventional produce is likely genetically modified causing more mutations in consumers. Pesticides and GMOs are not even more efficient over longer time periods (10+ years)​ in terms of yield. Infact they damage the eco system, strip soils of nutrients, require more to maintain. Thus these practices are unsustainable.

    I appreciate what Environmental Working Group is doing for the betterment of humans, animals, insects and the entire planet.

    • munchygut

      Last year, Chipolte closed 42 of their restaurants in the Northwest because of a listeria outbreak due to mishandling of the locally grown organic food they sell (they forgot to wash the poop off). About three years ago, here in the Midwest, we had an e-coli breakout traced to organic spinach from California and Mexico (they forgot to wash the poop off). Five years ago, in Germany, 1200 people were sickened and 50 of them died from food poisoning traced to organic bean sprouts. Since the late 80s, about 90% of corn and soybean products in the USA have been genetically modified (either BT or Roundup Ready). Not so much as a sniffle has been attributed to these products. Depending on when your were born, you have probably been eating them your entire life. I’ll take minuscule amounts of pesticides over three weeks of the shitz any day.

    • Hugo Cabret

      The benefits of pesticides, antibiotics, genetic modification, and preservatives astronomically outweigh the risks of food borne disease, while promoting food safety, high quality, and economic abundance.
      If you want to get off the food supply grid, please do so, and leave the rest of us the hell alone. Enjoy your poverty and short life expectancy.
      By the way, Masum, do not ever seek Western medicine for help, as you do not want to taint yourself.

    • Tenha juízo

      “Also conventional produce is likely genetically modified causing more mutations in consumers”
      Are you being serious right now? You actually believe this? Did you sleep through basic high school biology?

  • Wackes Seppi