Junk collecting: As little as 8 percent of our DNA may have functional impact

junkdna

The code that makes us is at least 75 percent rubbish, according to a study that suggests most of our DNA really is junk after all.

After 20 years of biologists arguing that most of the human genome must have some kind of function, the study calculated that in fact the vast majority of our DNA has to be useless.

…

[T]hroughout the 2000s, a number of studies purported to show that junk DNA was nothing of the sort, based on demonstrating that some tiny bits of non-coding DNA had some use or other. These claims proved popular with creationists, who were struggling to explain why an intelligently designed genome would consist mostly of rubbish.

…

[However,] if most of our DNA is functional, we would accumulate a large proportion of harmful mutations in important sequences. But if most of our DNA is junk, the majority of mutations would have no effect…Taking into account estimates of the mutation rate and average prehistorical reproduction rate, [the researchers] calculated that only around 8 to 14 per cent of our DNA is likely to have a function.

[Read the full study here]

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion, and analysis. Read full, original post: At least 75 per cent of our DNA really is useless junk after all

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT Image Jul 31, 2026, 08_05_37 AM
26% and far worse than during COVID: Under RFK Jr., Americans’ opinion of ‘revamped’ CDC hits an all-time low
Cancer mRNA Vaccine Concept
'A new frontier': Though scorned by RFK Jr., personalized mRNA vaccine offers hope for many suffering from melanoma skin cancer
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot-2026-10-26-at-11.06.10-AM
Viewpoint: The organic, good-food, small-farm movement is seductive but wrongheaded. Here’s the sustainability and environmental case for industrial farming
Screenshot-2026-10-24-121036
Many hospitals embrace longevity medicine. Are they separating science from hype?
Picture1
Viewpoint: How badly is the U.S. food-safety net fraying? FDA’s bungled handling of the tainted lettuce crisis deepens concerns over cuts to disease tracking and response
China Innovation Lightbulb 2
China’s 5-year plan to accelerate science innovation is putting the U.S. and Europe in the rearview mirror
Screenshot-2026-10-23-at-10.37.12-AM
Viewpoint: Drones, dollars and baby food: Critical innovations that anti-plastic ideologues willfully ignore
Crimson Drips Over the White House
In Trump administration redirect, U.S. steers NIH sharply away from biodefense and pandemic preparedness
Healthy Food Sensitivity Test Collection
Viewpoint: That’ll be $300: The wellness industry’s junk science scam to ‘fix’ your immune system that isn’t broken
West-Virginia-SNAP-Water-Bottle-Sticker
A ‘shining success’ or 'empty promises’: Two years along, West Virginians assess MAHA’s food promises
Screenshot-2026-10-19-at-12.04.51-PM
Victims of their own success: As memories of killer diseases fade, vaccine rejectionism soars
Screenshot 2026-10-16 at 5.38
PFAS in Agriculture: Science, Uncertainty, and Risk Communication
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.