Some Catholic ethicists decry human embryo gene editing as ‘immoral’

dn e

Researchers in Oregon have announced that they have successfully altered genes in a human embryo for the first time in the United States, but Catholic ethicists warn that the procedure is morally objectionable for many reasons.

“Their value as human beings is profoundly denigrated every time they are created, experimented upon, and then killed. Moreover, if such embryos were to grow up, as will doubtless occur in the future, there are likely to be unintended effects from modifying their genes,” [Father Tadeusz Pacholczyk, director of education for the National Catholic Bioethics Center said.]

While researchers laud the breakthrough as a step towards the birth of genetically modified humans and the potential ability to treat inherited genetic diseases, the embryonic humans created and tested in both the U.S. and Chinese experiments were all destroyed within a few days of the procedure.

“These experiments were nontherapeutic, as the goal was ultimately to destroy the embryos,” Father Pacholczyk continued. “Consent is particularly important when dealing with very vulnerable research subjects, and human embryos are among the most vulnerable of God’s creatures.”


The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion, and analysis. Read full, original post:
Amid Human Embryo Gene Editing in Oregon, Ethicists Say Procedure Is Immoral

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-8-2026-12_32_48-PM
Viewpoint: SCOTUS strikes a blow against junk science in Bayer glyphosate case. Will it deter mass tort litigators?
afb-a-b
As the EU loosens restrictions on agricultural gene editing, it remains years behind the rest of the world on equally-safe GMO foods
Screenshot-2026-07-08-at-9.36.03-AM
Viewpoint: Long-contained diseases are on the rise in the U.S. Are Trump cuts to blame?
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-12_23_17-PM
No, Bill Gates did not secretly engineer ticks to promote veganism
Viewpoint: Consensus as truth? How ‘misinformation police’ control policy narratives
Which among war, weather and cyber attacks is the biggest world threat? None of the above. It’s misinformation, and here’s why.
Screenshot-2026-07-10-at-2.02.54-PM
Viewpoint: In abortion-restricting Florida, misinformation abounds when Republican congresswoman faces an ectopic pregnancy
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-7-2026-01_57_55-PM
Viewpoint: Europe’s rejection of air conditioning is the poster child for misunderstanding how to mitigate the impact of climate change
Gemini_Generated_Image_gabo48gabo48gabo
Viewpoint: A plastic surgeon on why banning gender-transition surgery without further research is wrong and harmful
Screen-Shot-at-PM-pe-vra-kipgaprbdo-vd-ms-jpule-n-jqqaxf-l-e
Viewpoint: Will new breeding techniques help make European agriculture more competitive?
Screenshot 2026-07-11 100209
Viewpoint: Supplements to clean your liver? Not a good idea.
Screenshot-2026-07-10-at-3.10.50-PM
Snake-oil cures throughout history
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.