Genetics and obesity: Expanding waistlines can’t be blamed on poor lifestyle choices alone


Being overweight has sometimes been seen as a good thing, as well as a bad thing. A little more than 100 years ago, Lillian Russell was considered one of the most beautiful women in the US while  tipping the scales at 200 pounds. “Pleasantly plump” was considered healthy, and not a health problem.

Obesity was a different story. Far more than overweight, it invited social scorn, even in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. For most of the last (and all of the current) centuries, being obese has been seen as a lifestyle issue, solvable by strict adherence to diet, more exercise, and possibly, drugs and surgery.

But research has shown that poor lifestyle choices (like a bad diet and no exercise) only account for a weight gain between 13 and 17 pounds — hardly enough to alone create somebody whose body mass index (BMI) is 30 or above. But if lifestyle doesn’t explain obesity completely, then what does? Since obesity has been steadily rising since the 1980s, and today about 38 percent of Americans, 21 percent of Europeans, and 30 percent of the entire planet is obese, this question needs to be answered. Now, rather than later.

The biology of big

illustrating the concept of a fat gene as a genetic predisposition toward obesity.

Several biological factors have been found to play some role in obesity. Twin and adoption studies have pointed to a genetic basis. The role of heredity in obesity appears to be between 40 and 70 percent, and next-generation sequencing studies of whole genomes (GWAS) have uncovered about 100 common genetic variants that explain a small amount of variation leading to obesity. Some genes that appeared to affect obesity include the melanocortin 4 receptor (MCR4), in which a mutation led to severe obesity in one study. But only 6 percent of cases of obesity present with this mutation. Another target of investigation was the hormone leptin, which is made in fat cells and inhibits feeling of hunter.

One problem with studying direct genetic effects on obesity is that, so far, there aren’t any. Genes don’t direct weight gain. Instead, they regulate our hunger, or desire for food, and alternately, the feeling that we’re full and can’t eat another bite.

Pointing to chemical factors
In addition to leptin, several other molecules have been found to somehow regulate hunger and our desire to eat. These include a hunger-inducing hormone called ghrelin, levels of which rise after weight loss, increasing feelings of appetite. Other hormones suppress hunger, such as CCK, PYY, GLP-1, oxyntomodulin and uroguanylin, all made in the intestine. Still more regulatory hormones, including insulin and amylin, are made in the pancreas.

An epigenetic question
While the presence of these molecules has shown that a single “fat burning” pill probably won’t work for obesity, they don’t entirely explain how obesity arises. Researchers have turned to epigenetic changes for more answers:

  • Early findings that were hampered by small sample sizes and a limited number of genetic loci have been replaced by high-throughput investigations and genome-wide association studies. These have allowed examinations of the interactions between gene expression regulation, transcription, and the environment.
  • Early prenatal development, especially in the first trimester of pregnancy, seems to play a strong role in later adult obesity. Studies have pointed at nutritional deficits during that period of development as a likely factor in obesity later on. What mom didn’t eat would then determine how your body handles what you eat.
  • Some studies have identified a number of regions of methylated DNA (one key way in which epigenetic changes occur) that are different in fat cells of mice fed high-fat diets than in cells of mice with normal diets. Many of these methylated DNA regions also exist in human fat cells. These variations could indicate a change in how fat is metabolized in reaction to diet.

A major problem with epigenetic research, however, is determining whether an epigenetic change causes a change in metabolism, or is itself caused by the metabolic change. It will take more parsing of these variable regions, and more longitudinal studies (including two or more generations) to determine whether they cause obesity, or are a byproduct. Further, these studies would have to evaluate the effects of more widespread availability of food, particularly food that’s high in fat and sugar.

The World Health Organization has predicted surging obesity rates. With these increases will come diseases related to obesity, including type 2 diabetes, heart disease, stroke, osteoarthritis, and some cancers. Finding answers has never been more important, and will probably come from a complex array of factors, including diet, exercise and biology.

Andrew Porterfield is a writer and editor, and has worked with numerous academic institutions, companies and non-profits in the life sciences. BIO. Follow him on Twitter @AMPorterfield.

  • Proteomics may have to do something with obesity as well.

  • Chad
  • Roy Williams

    While I will not argue that various environmental and genetic factors influence what our body does with the food we consume, at the end of the day, “physics works”.
    Specifically, conservation of energy applies:
    all of the energy in the food we consume (chemical energy) must go to one of three “sinks”: (1) energy spent to maintain all life processes (both chemical and physical activity); (2) stored as potential energy (in the form of large molecules that can be oxidized to provide energy); (3) excreted.
    In shorthand:
    [food energy in] = [energy used to support life] + [energy stored] + [food energy excreted].
    So: [energy stored] = [food energy in] – { [energy used] + [energy excreted] }
    If you consume more energy than you can use or excrete unused, you gain weight. Genetics, environment, and behavior may influence { [energy used] + [ energy excreted] } but only one factor controls [food energy in]: your behavior.
    If you hesitate to believe this, just think about the pictures of WWII concentration camp survivors: were there any obese people in those pictures? No.
    Have you ever known someone who was hospitalized for a prolonged period of time due to injury or illness, and noticed that they lost a lot of weight?
    These are extreme examples of consuming less food energy than you use or discard, but anyone who deliberately looses weight does so by reducing food intake and/or increasing energy use.
    That is all pretty simple.
    Why are we addressing a simple but severe public health problem by making it complex and giving people pseudo-excuses for not altering their behavior so that they consume only as much food energy as they can use or discard?
    Yes, the genetics and environmental influences on the amount of food energy we use are interesting topics. They are no excuse for failure to control behavior. Less hand-to-mouth action will result in less obesity. The public health campaign needs to be: “eat less”.