Adding 24 new mutations to breast cancer risk calculations

Peripheral Neuropathy is Common After Breast Cancer Treatment x

Twenty-four previously unknown mutations that raise a woman’s risk of developing breast cancer have been identified by scientists. The ‘ground-breaking’ findings [February 28] provide an answer to thousands of victims of whom the disease runs in their family.

Cancer Research UK states that fewer than three per cent of cancers are caused by an inherited faulty gene. It says there are four known genes that can raise the risk of breast cancer, including the BRCA gene – famously carried by by Angelina Jolie.

But the new discovery, led by Professor Melissa Southey, could potentially extend that to 28, if further research confirms the findings. She said: ‘For the majority of women who undergo genetic testing, there is no explanation for their breast cancer predisposition.

‘This ground-breaking work is not only helpful for women from families with many cases of breast cancer. ‘It will improve breast cancer risk prediction for all women, and pave the way for the development of epigenetic therapeutics for breast cancer.’

They discovered the epigenetic changes can be passed down through generations without changing the DNA that makes the genes.

The study is one of the first to scan the genome for places where DNA methylation is heritable, and is the first to apply this to familial breast cancer.

Editor’s note: Read the full study

Read full, original post: Twenty-four previously unknown mutations that raise a woman’s risk of breast cancer have been identified following ground-breaking research

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot 2026-05-06 at 2.56
Singularity crisis ahead? Can super babies save us from rogue AI geniuses?
Screenshot-2026-05-01-at-1.29.41-PM
Viewpoint: What happens when whole grains meet modern food manufacturing? Labels don’t tell the whole story.
S
As vaccine rejectionism spreads, measles may be taking a more dangerous turn
Screenshot-2026-03-13-at-12.14.04-PM
The FDA wants to make many popular prescription drugs OTC—a great idea. Here’s why it’s unlikely to happen
Screenshot-2026-04-20-at-2.26.27-PM
Viewpoint — Food-fear world: The latest activist scientists campaign: Cancer-causing additives
Screenshot-2026-05-06-at-2.07.43-PM
Manufacturing a conspiracy: The timeline of how  the White House embraced the fringe claim that scientists are being mysteriously murdered
Screenshot-2026-05-01-at-11.56.24-AM
‘Science moves forward when people are willing to think differently’: Memories of DNA maverick Craig Venter
Screenshot-2026-04-03-at-11.15.51-AM
Paraben panic: How a flawed study, media hype, and chemophobia convinced the public of the danger of one of the safest classes of preservatives
images
The never-ending GMO debate: Pros and cons
Screenshot-2026-04-30-at-2.19.37-PM
5 myths about summer dehydration that could damage your health — or even kill you
Screenshot-2026-04-12-135256
Bixonimania: The fake disease scam that AI swallowed whole
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.