Can Elisabete Weiderpass reform controversial IARC cancer agency?

New IARC director Elisabete Weiderpass (Image source: news.lzu.edu.cn)
New IARC director Elisabete Weiderpass (Image source: news.lzu.edu.cn)

On Thursday 17th March, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (the IARC), appointed Dr. Elisabete Weiderpass as its new Director. She will replace Christopher Wild, the outgoing director.

Certainly the IARC’s critics will consider Dr Weiderpass’s election preferable to that of Mr Christofer Portier who – despite a history of polemics –  was among the 33 candidates in the election. But they may well be surprised that this blood is not as new as it may appear. Parts of Dr Weiderpass’s CV show that she was connected with the institution as long as 20 years ago. 

In fact, she did a post doc at the IARC in 1994 and since then seems to have been a strong supporter of the institute. She is also one of the authors of a 2015 study that rejected widespread criticism of the IARC. Her husband, Harri Vainio – a member of the Ramazzini Institute whose studies on glyphosate have been heavily criticized by the scientific community – is also linked to the IARC, where he was in charge of monographs from 1983 to 1987 and from 1990 to 1993. Finally, she was deeply involved in the glyphosate dispute as she co-authored a paper with Christopher Portier in which the authors sought to discredit EFSA’s work. We bet that scientists who have criticized the IARC’s bias will take a dim view of these details….

Read full, original post: Elisabete Weiderpass: Heading off controversy at the IARC?

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-12.21.32-PM
Viewpoint: Why the retracted Monsanto glyphosate study doesn’t change the science—the world’s most popular herbicide is safe 
Picture1
The FDA couldn’t find a vaccine safety crisis, so it buried its own research
ChatGPT-Image-May-1-2026-11_42_59-AM-2
Viewpoint: NAD is the wellness grifters latest evidence-lite longevity fad. At least the mice are impressed.
global warming
‘Implausible’: Top climate scientists reject worst-case scenario—soaring temperatures and fast-rising sea levels
Screenshot-2026-05-21-at-12.15.17-PM
UK gene-editing milestone: Livestock barley that increases ruminant value and reduces methane emissions is first-approved CRISPR crop
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-16-2026-02_56_53-PM
Financial incentives, over diagnosis, and weak oversight: Autism claims are driving up Medicare costs
vax-misinformation-main
Facts & Fallacies Podcast: Limit free speech to blunt social media misinfo?
Screenshot-2026-05-21-at-3.15.53-PM
Chiropractors may no longer be modern-day snake oil salesmen, but the benefits of their therapy are limited–at best
ChatGPT-Image-May-12-2026-11_27_01-AM-2
AI likely to improve health care, research shows—but not for blacks and ethnic minorities
red-meat-cancer-connection-1030x749
Meat sits atop the U.S.-RFK, Jr. food pyramid. How healthy is the carnivore diet?
Screenshot-2026-05-20-at-5.11.17-PM
Viewpoint: No, sugar doesn’t ‘feed’ cancer — common cancer myths, debunked
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.