Editing the brain? CRISPR and gold nanoparticles could make it possible

shutterstock x
Image credit: Shutterstock

Add this to the list of possible applications for the seemingly-magical gene editing technology CRISPR: helping people with neurological disorders edit their brains with pinpoint accuracy to alleviate the symptoms of their disorder.

That’s the potential promise of a new study, out today in the journal Nature Biomedical Engineering. In the study, a team of researchers from the University of Texas and the University of California at Berkeley as well as a Berkeley-based company called GenEdit describe a new process for using gold nanoparticles for the delivery of the Cas9 enzyme that does the editing. They say this technique, first described in a 2017 paper dealing with gene editing in muscle cells, could pose fewer problems than the viruses that serve as CRISPR’s conventional delivery method.

Related article:  When is it ok to edit the genome of a human embryo? Americans have mixed opinions

“This paper is the first demonstration that you can do non-viral gene editing in the brain and have local effects,” says Niren Murthy, a Berkeley bioengineer who has been working on new CRISPR delivery vehicles for several years. This kind of localized editing could potentially help treat patients with conditions such as Huntington’s Disease, epilepsy, chronic pain, or even addiction.

She says it might be possible, using this technology, to allow autistic people to treat unwanted symptoms such as repetitive behaviors just like they might with medicine—with the difference that CRISPR changes would likely be permanent.

Read full, original post: CRISPR could use gold nanoparticles to edit your brain

Outbreak
Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

As Europe sees record coronavirus cases and deaths, Slovakia is testing its entire adult population. WSJ's Drew Hinshaw explains how ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
globalmethanebudget globalcarbonproject cropped x

Infographic: Cows cause climate change? Agriculture scientist says ‘belching bovines’ get too much blame

A recent interview by Caroline Stocks, a UK journalist who writes about food, agriculture and the environment, of air quality ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...
favicon

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend