Beef producers, ‘alt-protein’ makers seek help settling ‘long-simmering dispute’

| | August 28, 2018
future food
Image: Victor de Schwanberg/Science Photo Library
This article or excerpt is included in the GLP’s daily curated selection of ideologically diverse news, opinion and analysis of biotechnology innovation.

On [August 23rd], the North American Meat Institute (NAMI), a Washington, D.C.-based association that represents the country’s biggest meat producers and food companies, and Memphis Meats, a San Francisco startup that’s racing to get lab-grown meat in stores, teamed up to appeal directly to President Trump to handle a long-simmering dispute.

At issue is which government agency should regulate this newer, fancier, lab-ier meat—the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) [or] the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ….

[The] groups from opposite sides of the fence co-signed a letter to the White House to settle the dispute. And that would make sense: both regulatory bodies are branches of the executive. Since thus far, Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue and FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb haven’t been able to figure out who should regulate this alt-meat, maybe their boss can.

Related article:  FDA rejects call for USDA takeover of CRISPR gene-edited animal regulation

“FDA should have oversight over pre-market safety evaluations for cell-based meat and poultry products,” the letter reads. “After pre-market safety has been established with FDA, USDA should regulate cell-based meat and poultry products, as it does with all other meat and poultry products, applying relevant findings from FDA’s safety evaluation to ensure products are safe, wholesome, and properly labeled.”

In other words, let each regulatory group do what they do best ….

Read full, original article: Meat producers and lab-grown protein companies finally set their beef aside

Share via
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend