Podcast with Dr. Paul Offit: Striking similarities between anti-biotech and anti-vaccine activism

In the late 1990s, after the first transgenic crops hit the market, critics of biotechnology argued that we didn’t know how “GMOs” affect human health. Nonetheless, the critics said, “Big Ag” managed to sneak these experimental crops into our food supply.

Twenty years and over 1,000 studies later, the argument hasn’t changed. “What impact do GM foods have on our health? The answer is, no one really knows,” the pro-organic group Just Label It claims. Gary Ruskin, co-director of  the anti-GMO outfit U.S. Right to Know, says this is because “[s]cience is for sale. Powerful corporations …. can have a powerful effect on what is known and what is not known. That appears especially true for the agrichemical industry.”

Want to follow the latest news and policy debates over agricultural biotechnology and biomedicine? Subscribe to our free newsletter.

These claims are of course false, but they bear a striking resemblance to the arguments made by anti-vaccine activists. The only difference is that vaccine skeptics aim their anger at the pharmaceutical industry, which has allegedly failed to show that vaccines are safe. This similarity between the two movements hasn’t escaped the attention of the scientific community. As science writer Mark Lynas noted in November 2017,

It is too early to claim that the anti-vaccine and anti-GMO movements are fully merging, but there seems little doubt that the circles of followers in their Venn diagrams driven by similar conspiracist fears about big corporations, ideological preference for ‘natural’ alternatives and opposition to modern science generally are increasingly overlapping.

The question worth asking, then, is why do these activist movements share so much in common? Dr. Paul Offit joins me to discuss the similarity between anti-biotech and anti-vaccine activism, and how the fear-based messaging central to both movements impacts the public’s understanding of science.

Related article:  How to save Monarch butterflies? Banning glyphosate and planting milkweeds won't help

Paul Offit is a pediatrician at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and an expert on vaccines, immunology, and virology. He has written 10 popular books and more than 160 papers in medical and scientific journals in the areas of rotavirus-specific immune responses and vaccine safety.

Cameron J. English is the GLP’s senior agricultural genetics and special projects editor. He is a science writer and podcast host. BIO. Follow him on Twitter @camjenglish

2 thoughts on “Podcast with Dr. Paul Offit: Striking similarities between anti-biotech and anti-vaccine activism”

  1. The first claim, about the effect of “GMOs” on human health, is not supported by the GLP link to “2000 articles”: the review by Nicolia et al. of 1783 papers covers far more than just human health.

  2. Paul Offit is with Wistar, which knowingly allowed its rubella vaccine’s inclusion in a dangerous MMR vaccine in the UK after its first withdrawal in Canada.
    https://www.autisminvestigated.com/paul-offit-indemnity/

    The maker of that vaccine, SmithKline Beckman, was then secretly indemnified by the British government. The vaccine was pulled in the UK, but the government shutdown the original autism-vaccine research at the Royal Free Hospital and stole medical records of children in the study for use in disciplinary action against the scientists to tarnish the work.
    https://www.autisminvestigated.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/INDEMNITYDOC.pdf

    Paul Offit is responsible for all of that.

Leave a Comment

News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.

Send this to a friend