Monsanto Roundup controversy: Glyphosate unlikely to pose cancer risk, Canada confirms

roundup spray
Credit: Grant Gerlock/Harvest Public Media

Health Canadaโ€™s primary objective in regulating pesticides is to protect Canadiansโ€™ health and the environment. That is why the Department regularly reviews all pesticides to make sure that they continue to meet modern health and safety standards.

Following the release of the Departmentโ€™sย final re-evaluation decisionย on glyphosate [the active ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup] in 2017, Health Canada received eight notices of objection. There have also been concerns raised publicly about the validity of some of the science around glyphosate in what is being referred to as the Monsanto Papers.

Health Canada scientists reviewed the information provided in these notices, and assessed the validity of any studies in question, to determine whether any of the issues raised would influence the results of the assessment and the associated regulatory decision.

After a thorough scientific review, we have concluded that the concerns raised by the objectors could not be scientifically supported when considering the entire body of relevant data. The objections raised did not create doubt or concern regarding the scientific basis for the 2017 re-evaluation decision for glyphosate. Therefore, the Departmentโ€™s final decision will stand.

[Editor’s note: In April 2017, Health Canada concluded that “Glyphosate is….unlikely to pose a human cancer risk.”]

Health Canada follows a transparent and rigorous science-based regulatory process when making decisions about the safety of pesticides. As part of this process, Health Canada will publish its response to each notice of objection in the Pest Management Regulatory Agencyโ€™sย Public Registryย on January 14.

Our scientists left no stone unturned in conducting this review. They had access to all relevant data and information from federal and provincial governments, international regulatory agencies, published scientific reports and multiple pesticide manufacturers. This includes the reviews referred to in the Monsanto Papers. Health Canada also had access to numerous individual studies and raw scientific data during its assessment of glyphosate, including additional cancer and genotoxicity studies. To help ensure an unbiased assessment of the information, Health Canada selected a group of 20 of its ownย scientists who were not involved in the 2017 re-evaluation to evaluate the notices of objection.

No pesticide regulatory authority in the world currently considers glyphosate to be a cancer risk to humans at the levels at which humans are currently exposed. We continue to monitor for new information related to glyphosate, including regulatory actions from other governments, and will take appropriate action if risks of concern to human health or the environment are identified.

Read original article: Statement from Health Canada on Glyphosate

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Jun-17-2026-10_52_43-AM
Utah is sad illustration of the dangers of Americaโ€™s alarmingโ€”and expandingโ€” anti-vaccine movement
Screenshot-2026-06-24-at-2.40.46-PM
Hegseth reversal: As Air Force flu outbreak continues to surge, military reinstitutes mandatory vaccines for recruits
Screenshot-2026-06-24-at-2.57.41-PM
Viewpoint: Trumpโ€™s Reflecting Pool algae fiasco points to a bigger culprit: Climate change
Screenshot-2026-06-22-at-9.04.46-PM
Kennedyโ€™s nutrition prescription for medical schools: Real problem, bad cure
Screenshot-2026-06-15-at-1.17.09-PM
Viewpoint: More and more younger men are falling outside our health system. What can reverse this?
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-23-2026-01_12_57-PM
After Mel Gibsonโ€™s Joe Rogan comments, grifters promoting ivermectin, without evidence, as a hantavirus preventiveย 
Screenshot-2026-06-23-at-12.00.12-PM
Desperate patients of autistic children paying up to $20,000 for bogus stem cell injections recommended by RFK, Jr.
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-19-2026-04_11_20-PM
Daubert for Dummiesโ€”Scientific Reliability in U.S. Courts: Daubert, Rule 702, and Made-for-Litigation Evidence
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-22-2026-01_30_11-PM
Facts & Fallacies podcast: Psychedelics for PTSD? Examining RFK, Jr's claims about ibogaine
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpointโ€”โ€œMiracle moleculeโ€ debunked: Why acemannan supplements donโ€™t work
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-22-2026-02_03_24-PM-2
AIโ€™s promotion of โ€˜fake newsโ€™ erodes everyday thinking, MIT study reveals
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-18-2026-04_15_29-PM
Viewpoint: RFK, Jr. ignores oversight of vast HHS programs to focus on his pet obsessionsโ€”and gets much of the science wrong
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-9-2026-01_11_37-PM
Turmeric supplements: More risks than benefits
Screenshot-2026-06-25-at-1.48.40-PM
Glyphosate affirmed as safe: Supreme Court rejects lawsuit claiming Roundup herbicide causes cancer, upholding EPA determination
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.