Forests can slow global warming, but growing evidence suggests they aren’t ‘climate saviors’

| | January 17, 2019

When it comes to fighting global warming, trees have emerged as one of the most popular weapons. With nations making little progress controlling their carbon emissions, many governments and advocates have advanced plans to plant vast numbers of trees to absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere in an attempt to slow climate change. But emerging research suggests that trees might not always help as much as some hope.

Forest schemes got a big boost from the 2015 Paris climate accord, which for the first time counted all countries’ efforts to offset their carbon emissions from fossil-fuel use and other sources by planting or protecting forests….California is allowing forest owners to sell credits to CO2-emitting companies, and other US states are considering similar programs, which could motivate projects that establish new forests and protect existing ones….

Related article:  We need to produce 56 percent more calories by 2050—can we do it sustainably?

Many scientists applaud the push for expanding forests, but some urge caution. They argue that forests have many more-complex and uncertain climate impacts than policymakers, environmentalists and even some scientists acknowledge. Although trees cool the globe by taking up carbon through photosynthesis, they also emit a complex potpourri of chemicals, some of which warm the planet.

Such concerns have prompted vigorous debate among scientists about how forests in different regions have warming or cooling effects.

Read full, original article: How much can forests fight climate change?

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion, and analysis. Click the link above to read the full, original article.

Leave a Comment

News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.

Send this to a friend