Genetically engineered humans: How do we decide when it’s ethical to create them?

3-21-2019 week human embryo x
Image: Bio Edge

Bioethicist Matthew Liao is open to genetic engineering in theory, but he says he was rather horrified to learn that twin girls had been born in China after a researcher genetically modified their embryos to resist HIV infection.

“My first reaction was, ‘This is really bad,’” recalls Liao.

Still, under the right circumstances, Liao, who served for two years on the Hinxton Group, which facilitates collaboration on stem cell research, believes genetic engineering can be used in an ethical way. And, in a paper in Bioethics, he puts forth a human rights-based approach to assessing which circumstances are right.

Liao introduces those principles with four “claims” on the ethics of genetic engineering:

Claim 1: it is not permissible to deliberately create an offspring that will not have all the fundamental capacities;

Claim 2: if such an offspring has already been created, it is permissible to bring that offspring to term;

Claim 3: it is not permissible to eliminate some fundamental capacity from an existing offspring; and

Claim 4: if it is possible to correct some lack of fundamental capacity—without undue burdens on parents or society—it may be impermissible not to do so.

Read full, original post: Is it ethical to genetically engineer people?

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}
screenshot at  pm

Are pesticide residues on food something to worry about?

In 1962, Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring drew attention to pesticides and their possible dangers to humans, birds, mammals and the ...
glp menu logo outlined

Newsletter Subscription

* indicates required
Email Lists
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.