Podcast: Remembering Rosalind Franklin: The overlooked scientist who helped discover the DNA double helix

file utjjlz
Rosalind Franklin Image: Jenifer Glyn/Wikimedia Commons

Everyone knows that James Watson and Francis Crick discovered the double helix structure of DNA. But fewer people are aware of the contribution of the talented team of X-ray crystallographers at King’s College London, including Rosalind Franklin, or the controversies surrounding their work. There’s an old joke among geneticists that captures the scandalous story: “What did Watson and Crick discover? Rosalind Franklin’s notes!”

Photo 51
Photo 51. Image: Raymond Gosling/King’s College London via Wikipedia

On this episode of Genetics Unzipped, biologist Kat Arney explores the hidden story behind the double helix, and asks whether Franklin truly got the recognition she deserved for her work. Watson and Crick without a doubt deserved the accolades they received. Their 1953 Nature paper describing the DNA double helix provided a key insight into how genetic information is replicated.

But the pair of scientists never did any experimental work to confirm that their model of DNA was accurate. Franklin and her colleagues at King’s College provided the crucial X-ray evidence, in particular the famous “photo 51,” that validated Watson and Crick’s hypothesis, and they produced it independently of the famous duo.

However, Franklin was hesitant to publish the research until she was absolutely certain it was correct. Watson later invited Franklin to collaborate, but she found his condescending attitude overwhelming and eventually moved on to conduct important research describing the structure of viruses. Without Franklin’s contributions, it’s possible Watson and Crick may have required more time to validate their model, allowing someone else to publish the groundbreaking discovery before they did.

Related article:  Billion-year-old microbes could give us new food, fuel sources—if we can figure out how to use them

Though later recognized for her important work on DNA, Franklin’s premature death resulting from ovarian cancer in 1958 prevented her from receiving the Nobel Prize, which isn’t awarded posthumously. Her cancer may have been hastened by exposure to X-rays incurred while conducting her DNA research.

Arney also explains why three is the magic number when it comes to cracking the DNA code, and the curious connection between a common genetic diagram and a box of strawberries.

Full transcript, credits and show notes here.

Genetics Unzipped is presented by award-winning science communicator and biologist Kat Arney and produced by First Create the Media for the UK Genetics Society. Follow Kat on Twitter @Kat_Arney and Genetics Unzipped @geneticsunzip

Listen to Genetics Unzipped on Apple Podcasts (iTunes) Google Play, Stitcher, Blubrry, TuneIn, Spotify, and Spreaker

Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
ft covidresponseus feature

Video: Viewpoint: The US wrote the global playbook on the coronavirus and then ignored it

A year ago, the United States was regarded as the country best prepared for a pandemic. Our government had spent ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
globalmethanebudget globalcarbonproject cropped x

Infographic: Cows cause climate change? Agriculture scientist says ‘belching bovines’ get too much blame

A recent interview by Caroline Stocks, a UK journalist who writes about food, agriculture and the environment, of air quality ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...
gmo corn field x

Do GMO Bt (insect-resistant) crops pose a threat to human health or the environment?

Bt is a bacterium found organically in the soil. It is extremely effective in repelling or killing target insects but ...

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend