Ugandan farmers clamor for access to GMO crops—a year after parliament passes biosafety bill

uganda
Credit: Christopher Bendana

Almost a year since the passing of the Genetic Engineering Regulatory Act (GERA), farmers are still waiting on the commercialization of biotech crops in Uganda. The Act—passed by the Parliament of Uganda in November 2018—would provide a framework to regulate commercialization of genetically engineered crops in Uganda, but is yet to be assented to by the President of the country.

Hundreds of showgoers including farmers, policymakers, representatives of civil society organizations, students, and teachers, among others were sensitized on current modern biotechnology research and development at the national annual agricultural show at the Source of the Nile, Jinja. Many farmers who visited the Uganda Biosciences Information Center (UBIC) stall at the show wondered why they still could not access the various genetically engineered crops developed by the National Agricultural Research Organization.

“I heard the (GERA) law was passed last year. Why haven’t you given us the GMOs yet?” inquired Regina Ndyamuhaki, a farmer from western Uganda whose banana plantation was devastated by the banana bacterial wilt. Regina, like many other farmers at the show are not aware that the Act still awaits Presidential assent before it becomes law. To the farmers, what they want is to test these solutions to their production challenges and determine whether they will work for them.

Read full, original article: Crop Biotech Update, July 24, 2019

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Jun-23-2026-03_12_23-PM
Is cellular reprogramming junk science? Nearly 20 patients are getting eye injections in the first FDA-cleared cellular trial
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-24-2026-11_36_47-AM
Why the human genome is less a script than a puzzle
Screenshot-2026-06-15-at-1.55.27-PM
America's trust in Trump-Kennedy's CDC health recommendations is plunging
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-12_23_17-PM
No, Bill Gates did not secretly engineer ticks to promote veganism
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-17-2026-10_52_43-AM
Anguished parents, doctors in tears: Utah’s long measles outbreak takes a toll
Screenshot 2026-06-25 at 10.55
Leading OB-GYN group challenges RFK, Jr. gutting of maternal vaccine schedule
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot-2026-06-22-at-9.04.46-PM
Kennedy's nutrition prescription for medical schools: Real problem, bad cure
Screenshot-2026-06-25-at-1.48.40-PM
Glyphosate affirmed as safe: Supreme Court rejects lawsuit claiming Roundup herbicide causes cancer, upholding EPA determination
Screenshot-2026-06-24-at-2.57.41-PM
Viewpoint: Trump’s Reflecting Pool algae fiasco points to a bigger culprit: Climate change
Screenshot-2026-06-24-at-2.40.46-PM
Hegseth reversal: As Air Force flu outbreak continues to surge, military reinstitutes mandatory vaccines for recruits

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.