Podcast: Glyphosate, cancer and ‘corporate conspiracies’–“Regulatory capture” by anti-science activists in the Roundup controversy

This article or excerpt is included in the GLP’s daily curated selection of ideologically diverse news, opinion and analysis of biotechnology innovation.

Humans have evolved to detect threats to our survival. That instinct helped us avoid deadly predators while we lived as hunter-gatherers for most of our 200,000-year history. But in today’s modern society, our useful threat-detection instinct has been warped into a serious handicap as we attempt to evaluate risks to our health.

toxic roundup
Image: Scott.net

There’s no better example of this phenomenon than the ongoing legal battle over Bayer’s controversial weed killer Roundup. The company faces thousands of lawsuits alleging that glyphosate, Roundup’s active ingredient, is a carcinogen responsible for causing Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL), a rare cancer whose causes remain elusive. Despite our limited understanding of NHL, misleading news stories and agenda-driven activist groups have left consumers with the impression that glyphosate–a relatively safe yet effective herbicide–is slowly poisoning our food supply, while Bayer attempts to cover up the evidence.

Related article:  Reflections on the Great Biotech Debate: Dissecting the arguments

In such a politically charged environment, how are consumers supposed to separate genuine health risks from overheated health scares? On this episode of the EcoModernist podcast, hosts Gabe Ignetti and GLP executive director Jon Entine sit down with legal scholar Drew Kershen and cancer epidemiologist Geoffrey Kabat to provide a rundown of food safety and pesticide exposure, with an emphasis on the current glyphosate controversy.

Want to follow the latest news and policy debates over agricultural biotechnology and biomedicine? Subscribe to our free newsletter.

While pesticides can pose real risks to human health, the panel explains, these chemicals also play an essential role in safely producing a steady food supply to feed a growing population. Armed with some basic knowledge of toxicology, it’s up to discerning consumers to evaluate the questionable health claims they see in news headlines and in their social media feeds.


Geoffrey Kabat is a cancer epidemiologist and the author of Hyping Health Risks: Environmental Hazards in Daily Life. Follow him on Twitter @GeoKabat

Drew Kershen is Professor of Law Emeritus, University of Oklahoma College of Law

Jon Entine is executive director of the Genetic Literacy Project. BIO. Follow him on Twitter @JonEntine

Gabe Ignetti is a host of the EcoModernist podcast

This episode of the EcoModernist podcast originally ran as Science on Trial and has been republished here with permission.

The GLP featured this article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis. The viewpoint is the author’s own. The GLP’s goal is to stimulate constructive discourse on challenging science issues.

Share via
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend