3 German science institutes say CRISPR-edited plants not GMOs, call for new EU biotech crop rules

Screen Shot at PM

The EU science community continues to put pressure on regulators to reform Europe’s genetic engineering law. On [Dece. 4] …. the German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina, the Union of German Academies of Science and the German Research Foundation (DFG) made recommendations for a “scientifically justified regulation” of genome-edited plants in the EU. Among other things, they recommend the amendment of European genetic engineering law.

Genome-edited plants without external genetic information are not GMOs

The research institutes said the GMO definition should be revised to the effect that genome-edited plants are not considered genetically modified organisms (GMOs) if no external genetic information is included – in analogy to plants modified using conventional breeding methods.

Related article:  GM insect-resistant Bt cotton boosted India's crop yields? Activist study says no, but crop biotech experts say yes

Similarly, a plant should not be considered a GMO if there is a combination of genetic information that could also arise naturally or with conventional breeding methods. In the long term, however, only a completely new legal framework is consistent, the statement goes on to say. In assessing risks to humans and the environment, this should focus not on the processes used to produce new varieties, but on their novel characteristics, the researchers write.

[Editor’s note: This article was published in German and has been translated and edited for clarity.]

Read full, original article: Leading science academies are demanding new genetic engineering law

Outbreak
Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

As Europe sees record coronavirus cases and deaths, Slovakia is testing its entire adult population. WSJ's Drew Hinshaw explains how ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
globalmethanebudget globalcarbonproject cropped x

Infographic: Cows cause climate change? Agriculture scientist says ‘belching bovines’ get too much blame

A recent interview by Caroline Stocks, a UK journalist who writes about food, agriculture and the environment, of air quality ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...
favicon

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend