Infographic: Buying time: What we gain from strong coronavirus measures, including suppression strategies

shs social distancing coronavirus covid x
Credit: Medscape

Summary of the article: Strong coronavirus measures today should only last a few weeks, there shouldnโ€™t be a big peak of infections afterwards, and it can all be done for a reasonable cost to society, saving millions of lives along the way. If we donโ€™t take these measures, tens of millions will be infected, many will die, along with anybody else that requires intensive care, because the healthcare system will have collapsed. [Note: This article contains numerous informative infographics.]

Here is how the Imperial College team modeled suppressions.

veeragrvsp xm

The green and yellow lines are different scenarios of Suppression. You can see that doesnโ€™t look good: We still get huge peaks, so why bother?

โ€ฆ

Presented like these, the two options of Mitigation and Suppression, side by side, donโ€™t look very appealing. Either a lot of people die soon and we donโ€™t hurt the economy today, or we hurt the economy today, just to postpone the deaths.

This ignores the value of time.

โ€ฆ

What if you were about to face your worst enemy, of which you knew very little, and you had two options: Either you run towards it, or you escape to buy yourself a bit of time to prepare. Which one wouldย youย choose?

This is what we need to do today. The world has awakened. Every single day we delay the coronavirus, we can get better prepared.

Read the original post

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-May-7-2026-12_16_37-PM-2
Viewpoint: Are cancer rates โ€˜skyrocketingโ€™ as RFK, Jr. and MAHA claims? The evidence says mostly the opposite
ChatGPT-Image-May-13-2026-11_56_08-AM
After slashing global health aid by $19 Billion, Trump moves to tap $2.1 billion moreโ€”to cover shutdown costs
Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-10.46.29-AM
Viewpoint: How to counter science disinformation? Science journalist offers 12 practical tips
ChatGPT-Image-May-12-2026-08_39_41-PM
GLP podcast: Big Pharma, Big Ag, Big Foodโ€”health harming industries or life-saving innovators?
Screenshot-2026-04-23-at-11.00.36-AM
Regulators' dilemma: Thalidomide, Metformin, and the cost of getting drug approvals wrong
png-pill-omega-Supp-fish-oil
Millions take omega-3 fish oil for brain health. New research suggests it may do the opposite.
Screenshot-2026-02-20-at-10.48.04-AM
Deepfakes raise profound ethical questions in science
Picture1-5
Science Disinformation Gap: The transatlantic battle over social media and censorship
Picture1-1
Cooling the planet with balloons: Could a geoengineering gamble slow global warming?
ChatGPT-Image-May-12-2026-01_41_42-PM
Viewpoint: โ€˜Measles is a canary in the healthcare coal mineโ€™: Challenging RFK, Jr.โ€™s scare campaign
Screenshot-2026-05-08-at-3.40.33-PM
Seeds of power: China turns to genetic engineering to become global superpower
donut-decorated-with-e-food-additives-tablets
RFK, Jr. is targeting chemical food additives. What does science tell us?
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.