Is ‘serious genetic condition’ a useful term?

Credit: iStock
Credit: iStock

Despite no consensus on the definition of ‘seriousness’, the concept is regularly used in policy and practice contexts to categorize conditions, determine access to genetic technologies and uses of selective pregnancy termination.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

The importance of including the perspectives of people living with genetic conditions in understanding the subjective nature of ‘seriousness’ is increasingly acknowledged.

Indeed, there are examples in the literature of people with disabilities evaluating their condition and quality of life (QoL) differently—and often more positively—than others around them do, suggesting differences in condition appraisal between those with and without lived experience

[In a study in the European Journal of Human Genetics,] participants generally reported good current health, with very few stating they had bad or very bad health/wellbeing. Interview participants highlighted how their positive health status could come as a surprise to other people.

Samantha (32, CF), who was on the waiting list for a lung transplant, commented,

I think people are surprised when I say I’m doing fine and feel ok most days. Yes, I will have been doing nebulisers all morning and night…but that’s my normal. Perhaps my normal is different to other people’s, but it’s my normal, you know?

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here.

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

wuhan institute of virology main entrance
​​COVID lab leak? Making a case that the Wuhan market origins theory is wrong
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot-2026-06-17-at-9.44.03-AM
Viewpoint: Embryos are becoming the newest battleground of love, loss, and legal uncertainty
Screenshot-2026-06-18-at-11.41.51-AM
Viewpoint—Protecting baloney science: Far right senators move to protect the phony homeopathy industry
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-9-2026-01_11_37-PM
Turmeric supplements: More risks than benefits
artificial intelligence brain think illustration md
Viewpoint — Digital gods and human extinction: Will we be the first species ever to design our own descendants?

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.