Viewpoint: Are we overusing agricultural chemicals? Not if we we want increased yields, lower prices and more sustainable practices

1940s farmers toiling to produce food and build wealth. Credit: Marion Post
1940s farmers toiling to produce food and build wealth. Credit: Marion Post

We would be remiss to ignore the positive effects that modern crop protection has had for us. Without pesticides,ย crop losses would be between 50 and 80%, which in turn would lead to higher food prices, and shortages leading to queues in front of supermarkets the likes we only experience in times of crisis.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Our history of farming ought to be a cautionary tale of how it used to be, and what we don’t want to go back to. Unfortunately, environmental organisations are supporting a “back to basics” approach to agriculture, by supporting production methods such as “agro-ecology”, which reject the notion of using pesticides altogether. They do so by challenging crop protection tools, even after they passed rigorous safety testing. In the long-run, this will [reduce] the availability of their products, but by failing to guarantee the safety of the food they consume.

We should not pretend that those consumers who buy conventional food products have moved away from the “healthy” or the “natural” โ€“ not only is that untrue, it is also an underappreciation of what modern farming has done to improve the lives of farmers and consumers alike.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here.

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Picture1
The FDA couldnโ€™t find a vaccine safety crisis, so it buried its own research
Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-12.21.32-PM
Viewpoint: Why the retracted Monsanto glyphosate study doesnโ€™t change the scienceโ€”the worldโ€™s most popular herbicide is safeย 
Screenshot-2026-05-19-at-11.23.34-AM
West-originated vaccine disinformation sparks murders of health care workers across Africa
ChatGPT-Image-May-7-2026-12_32_36-PM
Viewpoint: The state of U.S. vaccine policy? Dismal nationally, but some states are stepping up.
_20250221_nib_rfk_trump
Viewpoint: 'Crisis of public trust': Autism support community shocked RFK continues to peddle false claims about the danger of vaccines
Screenshot-2026-04-12-135256
Bixonimania: The fake disease scam that AI swallowed whole
placebo
Viewpoint โ€” Alternative medicine and the placebo effect: Selling a reassuring illusion of health
ChatGPT-Image-May-12-2026-11_27_01-AM-2
AI likely to improve health care, research showsโ€”but not for blacks and ethnic minorities
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.