Do artificial sweeteners fuel cancer? New data reignite the debate

Credit: USA Today
Credit: USA Today

A new study has reawakened a decades-old debate over the safety of artificial sweeteners, suggesting a small association can be detected between sugar substitutes such as aspartame or acesulfame-K and increased cancer risk. The authors of the new study call for a re-evaluation of these artificial sweeteners by food safety regulators, however, experts not affiliated with the research claim the findings are weak and mistake causation with correlation.

For years researchers have argued over the health impacts of artificial sweeteners in humans. While these controversial food additives may not necessarily be completely benign, there has been consistently conflicting evidence regarding potential deleterious health impacts.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

The big headline finding is those subjects in the study consuming high levels of artificial sweeteners were found to experience greater incidences of cancer compared to those with low to no intake of artificial sweeteners. In particular, aspartame and acesulfame-K were linked to higher risk of breast and obesity-related cancers.

โ€œOur findings do not support the use of artificial sweeteners as safe alternatives for sugar in foods or beverages and provide important and novel information to address the controversies about their potential adverse health effects,โ€ the researchers concluded in the new study.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here.ย 

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot 2026-05-26 at 10.15
Viewpoint: Double standardโ€”Why does the wellness industry get a free pass while Big Healthcare is treated as morally suspect?
global warming
โ€˜Implausibleโ€™: Top climate scientists reject worst-case scenarioโ€”soaring temperatures and fast-rising sea levels
Screenshot-2026-06-03-at-3.33.44-PM
Viewpoint: Vaccine deniers are attacking a life-saving Vitamin K shot for newborns that isnโ€™t even a vaccine
Screenshot-2026-06-05-at-1.44.09-PM
Viewpoint: Scientists have scrapped the worst-case climate scenario. Is that proof that climate change is a hoax, as Trump claims?
Screenshot 2025-08-25 203032
Mazzengaโ€™s 20-year old muscles: How a still-going-strong 92-year old sprinter wins every race she enters
Screenshot-2026-06-08-at-1.35.30-PM
Viewpoint: Social media and fake natural health propaganda fuel surge in use of mostly useless supplements
px extra strength tylenol and tylenol pm
Why โ€˜null-findingsโ€™ on Tylenolโ€™s safety for pregnant women barely move the needle on countering misinformation
Screenshot-2026-06-08-at-10.19.30-AM
โ€˜Naturalโ€™ wellness supplements linked to liver injury
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-10-2026-12_57_24-PM
Viewpoint: Why gene-editing babies is moral and certain to happen
ChatGPT-Image-May-28-2026-12_56_54-PM
Viewpoint: Vaccines' non-specific effects? The โ€˜shoddyโ€™ Danish couple whose 'researchโ€™ inspires RFK, Jr.โ€™s health delusion
Screen Shot at AM
Facts & Fallacies Podcast: Right-wing politics bad for your health? Separating speculation from science
Credit: ACSH
Viewpoint: Who and whatโ€™s to blame for the surge in vaccine-preventable diseases?
Screenshot-2026-06-05-at-2.12.30-PM
Some plants can poison you. So how did humans figure out what is safe to eat?
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.