Is humanity doomed because our population is growing too fast — or too slow? Here’s the skinny on human catastrophe scenarios

Credit: Istock
Credit: Istock

Will birthrates doom humanity? Tech billionaire Elon Musk sounded an old alarm in December when he claimed that declining births are “one of the biggest risks to civilization.”

“Please look at the numbers,” he implored the Wall Street Journal’s CEO Council. “If people don’t have more children, civilization is going to crumble, mark my words.”

Such population doomsaying is not limited to billionaires. Paleontologist Henry Gee argued in November that our species is destined for extinction ― and soon. 

Mis- and disinformation are distorting science and public policy. Subscribe to our Daily and Weekly Digests for incisive coverage of ‘disruptive’ innovations in AI, agricultural biotechnology, food, chemicals, nuclear energy, vaccines, and other disruptive innovations.

Other prominent figures have naturalized doomsday ― from the opposite direction. Stanford biologist Paul Ehrlich famously predicted that population growth would outpace food production in the 1970s, leading hundreds of millions to starve to death. Even today, some scientists and environmentalists fear that humans will exceed the planet’s carrying capacity and in doing so, destroy themselves.

…

In addition to the climate crisis, we live in a time of war, inequality, white supremacist violence, backlash against women’s rights, technological upheaval and fraying social networks. None of these dire conditions is a biological or ecological inevitability. Nor is human extinction.

To assert otherwise is to disavow responsibility for the policies and power structures that cause habitat degradation, income inequality and widespread injustice ― conditions that already threaten the lives of countless people and other beings on this planet.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here. 

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot-2026-09-17-at-1.07.08-PM
'We are dangerously addicted to antidepressants': Should we heed RFK Jr.’s sobering warning?
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-25-2026-11_36_56-AM
Now AI almost started a war with China
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-2-2026-02_03_32-PM
How much of a problem is AI’s water use?
Screenshot-2026-09-28-at-2.41.21-PM
Viewpoint: 7-OH controversy: An opioid is available over-the-counter–even at gas stations. Should we be concerned?
Screenshot-2026-09-24-at-3.25.18-PM
No, organic eggs are not more nutritious or necessarily healthier than regular eggs. They are just far more expensive.
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-25-2026-10_36_43-AM
New federal autism committee head has financial ties to leucovorin
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-22-2026-11_17_31-AM
The exploding controversy over AI’s built-in survival drive
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-25-2026-11_57_15-AM
RFK, Jr. likely violated federal ethics guidelines in accepting more than $4,275,000 in gifts and book advances from MAHA allies
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-27-2026-10_00_17-AM
Current and future RFK Jr. aides criticize his science-rejectionist vaccine views
Woman_Vaping_Electronic_Cigarette_50687233623
Trump administration clears the way for speedy approvals of once-restricted tobacco vapes and pouches
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-21-2026-11_54_00-AM
Viewpoint: Activist environmental NGOs are turning from public funding to activist billionaires to support their campaigns. It won’t end well.
Screenshot-2026-09-24-at-1.24.47-PM
80% of Americans take (mostly useless) supplements for their health
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.