GLP Podcast: ‘Toxic 10’ chemicals in food; Gene editing treats heart disease? Dog-breed myths debunked

There’s a “toxic 10” group of chemicals lurking in every single food you consume. Listen in to find out what you should know about these ubiquitous substances. Could gene editing reverse some cases of heart disease? Finally, can you predict a dog’s behavior based on which breed it belongs to? A new study says no.

Join geneticist Kevin Folta and GLP contributor Cameron English on episode 167 of Science Facts and Fallacies as they break down these latest news stories:

These 10 substances can literally kill you if you consume them in large enough quantities. They’re found in every single food you eat, organic and conventional, and there’s no product label that could help you avoid them in the grocery store. Each has a challenging chemical name, but all of them can be classified as—vitamins. Eaten in the reasonable amounts found in plants and animals, vitamins are of course perfectly safe and necessary for good health. Nonetheless, the toxic 10 illustrates just how misleading claims about “harmful chemicals in food” can be.

People who carry certain mutations in the PCSK9 gene are predisposed to develop very high (and potentially harmful) levels of LDL cholesterol, which can lead to heart disease. Thanks to advances in gene-editing, these patients in the coming years may have access to a one-time treatment that corrects the troublesome mutation responsible for their abnormally elevated cholesterol levels. Are we moving closer to an outright cure for heart disease?

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

If you think you can predict a dog’s temperament based on its breed, you’re probably wrong, according to a just-published study. The researchers asked hundreds of dog owners about their pets’ behavior and compared the results with 11 genetic regions strongly associated with traits like howling and sociability with humans. The surprising conclusion: These DNA segments are not more common in certain breeds than others.

Even behavioral traits often thought to be breed specific, for example, how well a dog responds to commands, varied significantly among individual animals within the same breed. Will subsequent research force us to rethink our assumptions about man’s best friend?

Kevin M. Folta is a professor, keynote speaker and podcast host. Follow Professor Folta on Twitter @kevinfolta

Cameron J. English is the director of bio-sciences at the American Council on Science and Health. Visit his website and follow ACSH on Twitter @ACSHorg

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}
screenshot at  pm

Are pesticide residues on food something to worry about?

In 1962, Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring drew attention to pesticides and their possible dangers to humans, birds, mammals and the ...
glp menu logo outlined

Newsletter Subscription

* indicates required
Email Lists
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.