Viewpoint: Germany’s anti-GMO ‘Slow Food’ activist group invokes ‘precautionary principle’, demands labeling to block crop gene editing deregulation

Credit: RT
Credit: RT

A strong lobby of some corporations, technological and scientific associations is committed to exempting new genetic engineering processes from regulation under EU genetic engineering law. This would result in genetically modified organisms (GMOs) entering the seed and food market without an independent risk assessment and labeling requirement. A genetically modified tomato could then no longer be distinguished from a conventionally bred one.

For years, the approval and labeling of GMOs in the European Union has been regulated according to the precautionary principle: Only approved GMOs are allowed on the market after they have been checked for their risks. They must be identified and traceable. The European Commission now wants to soften this for new genetic engineering.

Not with us! More than 80 percent of EU citizens want to know whether their food contains genetic engineering and they want a risk assessment of GMO products. Farmers demand the right to continue to be able to produce independently without genetic engineering. Deregulation of new genetic engineering would be a frontal assault on our freedom of choice and democratic autonomy over what we breed, grow and eat.

Credit: Slow Food

New genetic engineering methods, in particular CRISPR/Cas technology, for modifying plants, animals and microorganisms also harbor new and inestimable risks. The supreme court of justice of the EU therefore ruled in 2018: Even new genetic engineering is genetic engineering and must be regulated as such.

Now the course is being set in Brussels. We therefore call on those responsible in politics, in particular Federal Minister of Agriculture Cem Özdemir and Federal Minister for the Environment Steffi Lemke , to work towards maintaining regulation of the new genetic engineering. This includes: identification, risk assessment, approval, traceability, transparency, monitoring and liability.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

We request:

  1. New genetically modified organisms (GMO) must also be labeled in such a way that consumers, farmers, breeders, traders and processors can recognize and avoid them at any time.
  2. New GMOs must also continue to be subjected to a risk assessment and assessment in accordance with the EU precautionary principle.
  3. Traceability and verification procedures must remain a requirement for approval for GMOs, as must the ability to be retrieved. Whoever brings GMOs onto the market must be liable for risks and consequential damage.
  4. The EU, federal and state governments must fund more research on the environmental, biodiversity and health risks of new GMOs, their socio-economic effects and the development of general detection methods.
  5. In order to promote diverse, climate-friendly and socially just ecological and rural agriculture, research and further development of proven and effective non-GMO agroecological methods should be promoted.

[Editor’s note: This article was originally published in German and has been translated and edited for clarity.]

Read the original post

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Picture1
Hiroshima at 81: America’s new nuclear bomb, a buried Iranian target, and a question no one wants to ask
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-31-2026-07_35_35-AM
Wikipedia has assembled an informative list of fake news websites from across the ideological spectrum
ChatGPT Image Jul 29, 2026, 09_08_15 AM 2
The retreat of environmental extremism: Why activist NGOs are losing favor
ChatGPT Image Jul 29, 2026, 10_17_59 AM
Viewpoint: What does it mean when critics of conventional agriculture say many fruits and vegetables are “linked” to pesticide poisoning?
ChatGPT Image Jul 31, 2026, 08_05_37 AM
With trust in RFK, Jr.'s CDC vaccine advice collapsing, physicians scramble to fill the information gap
Screenshot-2026-07-31-at-9.37.42-AM
Obsessing about ultra-processed foods but ignoring what matters far more: A balanced diet
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot-2026-07-31-at-10.10.55-AM
Viewpoint: ‘Misinformation' about the effects of offshore wind turbines on marine life could derail offshore wind farm projects 
ChatGPT Image Jul 29, 2026, 06_26_01 PM 2
Facts & Fallacies podcast: Organic food myths make a comeback on Instagram, with Dr. Kevin Folta
Screenshot-2026-08-03-at-2.15.16-PM
Viewpoint: Trump’s relaxed controls on supplying China with microchips could undermine U.S. AI dominance
leeteam
How Kennedy and his family could pocket millions from Merck’s $50 million vaccine injury settlement that he oversaw
Screenshot-2026-07-30-at-3.07.42-PM
Controversy over WNBA star Sophie Cunningham’s comment opposing trans females in women’s sports reinvigorates the culture wars
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-10-2026-12_21_03-PM
Viewpoint: Is there new evidence that the animal deworming drug ivermectin decreases the risk of Covid and cancer? Don’t waste your money.
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.