How did ancient animals evolve to be so giant?

Credit: JSTOR Daily
Credit: JSTOR Daily

Prehistoric giants used to populate the Earth. These behemoths included mighty dinosaurs, airplane-size pterosaurs, massive crocodiles and snakes, and even armadillos the size of cars. But today, there are just a few big animals on our planet.

What happened? Why aren’t there many giants left anymore?

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Several major differences between dinosaurs and today’s largest animals, the mammals, may help explain the loss of behemoths… In dinosaurs, air sacs likely extended from their lungs to their bones, creating sturdy but light scaffolding, Edinburgh University paleontologist Steve Brusatte told Scientific American.

That gave dinosaurs skeletons that were “still strong and still flexible, but lightweight. That helped them get bigger and bigger and bigger,” Brusatte said. “The same way that skyscrapers are getting bigger and bigger and bigger because of the internal support structures.”

โ€ฆ

Brewers of gigantism shouldn’t forget the crucial ingredient of time, either. Though animal lineages tend to get larger over the generations, it takes a vast amount of evolutionary time to reach giant sizes, [paleobiologist Greg] Erickson said. And mass extinction events tend to wipe out larger creatures, [geobiology professor Geerat] Vermeij said, so these events can leave giant-animal slots unfilled for tens or hundreds of millions of years. “It took about 25 million years for the first mammals to reach a ton in weight,” he said.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here.ย 

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Picture1
The FDA couldnโ€™t find a vaccine safety crisis, so it buried its own research
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-16-2026-02_56_53-PM
Financial incentives, over diagnosis, and weak oversight: Autism claims are driving up Medicare costs
Screenshot-2026-05-19-at-11.23.34-AM
West-originated vaccine disinformation sparks murders of health care workers across Africa
Screenshot-2026-05-08-at-11.55.47-AM
Anti-vax activists falsely blame COVID vaccines for the rising U.S. cancer rate among younger people.
Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-12.21.32-PM
Viewpoint: Why the retracted Monsanto glyphosate study doesnโ€™t change the scienceโ€”the worldโ€™s most popular herbicide is safeย 
ChatGPT-Image-May-12-2026-11_27_01-AM-2
AI likely to improve health care, research showsโ€”but not for blacks and ethnic minorities
ChatGPT-Image-May-7-2026-12_32_36-PM
Viewpoint: The state of U.S. vaccine policy? Dismal nationally, but some states are stepping up.
modi visit sikkim
Viewpoint: Indian PM wants farmers to switch to 50% organic. It would take at least 10 years, likely wonโ€™t work, and isnโ€™t more sustainable
Screenshot-2026-05-18-at-12.57.12-PM
Viewpointโ€”โ€˜Technology is pulling us apartโ€™: Environmental, political, and economic
Screenshot-2026-04-13-at-1.39.26-PM
Viewpoint: โ€˜Safer for children?โ€™ Stonyfield yogurt under fire for deceptive organic marketing
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.